venice vs sandiego - Techist - Tech Forum

Go Back   Techist - Tech Forum > Computer Hardware > New Systems | Building and Buying
Click Here to Login
Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
 
Old 02-05-2006, 11:21 PM   #1 (permalink)
True Techie
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 109
Default venice vs sandiego

Long story short picked up a HP a1230n dirt cheap ($331. A/R)and it is supposed to have a 3700+ 2.2GHz 1mb L2 cpu and when I ran cpuz it says it has a 3800+ 2.4GHz 512 L2 So I havent called HP on there mistake but did look on newegg and noticed the 3800+ was about 50 bucks more, Is the L2 more important then the clock speed in this case? What would you rather have?
__________________

buyxgmistake is offline  
Old 02-06-2006, 07:33 AM   #2 (permalink)
True Techie
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 109
Default

shameless bump
__________________

buyxgmistake is offline  
Old 02-06-2006, 10:39 AM   #3 (permalink)
Monster Techie
 
aj2003's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,094
Default

the difference will be minimal, only noticable in benchmarks. I would rather the san 2.2 sandiego because it would overclock to the same place as the venice but still has the 1mb chace, however i dont think youll be able to do much overclocking on a HP so doesnt really matter which you have
__________________
AMD x2 5000+ black edition at 3.3GHZ zalman cnps 9700-NT
Gigabyte GA-M57SLI-S4 motherboard
3072mb: OCZ ddr800 gold
2x 7800GTX in SLI for 20" viewsonic
OCZ 600watt power supply
www.angelic-accessories.co.uk - plug for my gfs site
aj2003 is offline  
Old 02-06-2006, 01:37 PM   #4 (permalink)
Do work.
 
molsen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Jacksonville, FL
Posts: 1,177
Send a message via AIM to molsen
Default

technically, the 3800+ is the faster proc...hence its p-rating. i would complain as much as you can and try to get some rebates or free stuff out of it...but the bottom line is the processors are going to perform about the same anyways
__________________
http://mattjolsen.tumblr.com
flickr

Intel E8400 @ 3.78ghz
8gb (4x2gb) G.SKILL DDR2 1600 @ 420mhz, 5-5-5-12
ASrock P43Twins1600 (hates RAM dividers)
WD Caviar 500gb + 250gb hdd, 32mb cache
eVGA 7900gs @ 585/1700mhz
OCZ GameXStream 600w PSU
Sound Blaster X-Fi Platinum
Cooler Master Centurion 5 case
molsen is offline  
Old 02-06-2006, 04:10 PM   #5 (permalink)
True Techie
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 114
Default

Go for the San Diego. The 1MB L2 Cache will make ur rig cooler and more stable. U wont even notice the difference in 100 Mhz. Both cores are nice by the way.
__________________
DFI Lan party UT NF4 Ultra
AMD Opteron 146 2.0 Mhz @ 2.8 GHz
OCZ Gold Edition 2x512 MB DDR 500 timing 2.5-3-3-8 @ DDR 560
XFX GeForce 7600 GT 256 Mb GDDR3
Antec Lanboy Mini Tower Case
Antec True Control 550W ATX2.0 PSU
Maxtor 300 GB 7200 RMP SATA 16Mb Cache
17\'\' TFT Screen 12 ms
MysticRose is offline  
Closed Thread

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off




Copyright 2002- Social Knowledge, LLC All Rights Reserved.

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:20 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.