The Ultimate DREAM COMPUTER CHALLANGE GAME. BUILD AT YOUR OWN RISK!!

[MrCoffee]

Nah, you want that frozen CPU case... -40c...

 

[Tordenskjold]

Wtf i cant belive thi sis still going.. this thread its off topic ********...

 

[RicoDirenzo]

Wtf i cant belive thi sis still going.. this thread its off topic ********...

Yep.......the thread poster got up this morning and drank a whole gallon of fresh squeezed Dumbass! Stupid thread!

 

[Tordenskjold]

Yep.......the thread poster got up this morning and drank a whole gallon of fresh squeezed Dumbass! Stupid thread!

THANK YOU! someone who agrees..!

 

[KlNGPlN]

lol stupid nerds are getting upset over a thread, thats when you know there a bunch of sorry excuses, if u dont like it dont click it *****

 

[harry18]

yea i agree ^^ i mean jeeze its a timy thread on some little forum, you bunch of losers are acting like hes burning a hole in the planet, get off your arse, and vist the real world...there are worse things you can waste your time complaing over

 

[Spartan]

at least choose a possible configuration. the FX-60 does not have multi-processor support and there are no dual s939 motherboards.

personally i would look at something with extreme power for number crunching and encoding

dude, he was obviously joking. u know wut a joke is, rite?? personally, i found that reply to be hilarious unlike SOME people.

 

[kmote]

while the idea of people throwing away their perfectly good PCs to build something that i doubt many people actually have the technical knowlege (or the money) to build may seem ridiculous, the number of posters on this thread surely goes to prove that this might not be the pointless thread that some people think it is.
prehaps sometimes its good to pretend to build the ultimate machine even if there is no way that it could actually be achieved (most of us live in the real world lol)

 

[john3]

1GW of power,

ur jking right? 1 GW of power? unless ur running like a freaking 100 Computer lan party ( All computers with highest technology).........i see no point.

 

[kmote]

i think that it was just a typo 1KW is probably what he meant
there is no real need to be that picky

and also note that it would probably take ~700-800 computers to use all that power