OP OP G Gabb gone Messages 2,051 Nov 1, 2008 #21 veedubfreak said: Yep, find a good set of low latency ddr2 800. My reapers run 4-4-4-12 at 2.1v. Click to expand... I have a good ddr2 800 set that runs at 4-4-4-12 at 2.1 the G.skill I have right now...problem is another 2 gigs cost another 100
veedubfreak said: Yep, find a good set of low latency ddr2 800. My reapers run 4-4-4-12 at 2.1v. Click to expand... I have a good ddr2 800 set that runs at 4-4-4-12 at 2.1 the G.skill I have right now...problem is another 2 gigs cost another 100
Nagasama disgruntled ex-moderator Messages 6,956 Location probably on the lake Nov 2, 2008 #22 5-5-5-15 vs 5-5-5-18 = exactly no difference that you will ever notice/see/touch/smell. the reapers will run 1066 at 4-4-4-12. mine do anyway.
5-5-5-15 vs 5-5-5-18 = exactly no difference that you will ever notice/see/touch/smell. the reapers will run 1066 at 4-4-4-12. mine do anyway.
baron5 Fully Optimized Messages 2,984 Location Australia Nov 2, 2008 #23 Gabb said: hmm well since I have a q6600 and the max overclock is 3.6 ghz, which equates to 400 fsb, I guess I won't need the 1066 sticks then right? ( for all intensive purposes I consider the max OC to be 3.6 and even that requires a lot ) Click to expand... well get ddr880 and ull be 1:1
Gabb said: hmm well since I have a q6600 and the max overclock is 3.6 ghz, which equates to 400 fsb, I guess I won't need the 1066 sticks then right? ( for all intensive purposes I consider the max OC to be 3.6 and even that requires a lot ) Click to expand... well get ddr880 and ull be 1:1
gurusan Golden Master Messages 6,562 Location Portland, OR Nov 2, 2008 #24 nagasama said: 5-5-5-15 vs 5-5-5-18 = exactly no difference that you will ever notice/see/touch/smell. the reapers will run 1066 at 4-4-4-12. mine do anyway. Click to expand... Do you mind running an everest mem/cache test at those settings? 1066 4,4,4,12 is impressive
nagasama said: 5-5-5-15 vs 5-5-5-18 = exactly no difference that you will ever notice/see/touch/smell. the reapers will run 1066 at 4-4-4-12. mine do anyway. Click to expand... Do you mind running an everest mem/cache test at those settings? 1066 4,4,4,12 is impressive
1 1337_JohnN 1337 §tatus Messages 574 Location Southern California Nov 2, 2008 #25 Ok, what's better? 4-4-4-12 @ 1066 OR 5-5-5-15 @ 1066
1 1337_JohnN 1337 §tatus Messages 574 Location Southern California Nov 2, 2008 #28 Why? What's the best 6400 RAM:? Is it this? Newegg.com - G.SKILL PI Black 4GB (2 x 2GB) 240-Pin DDR2 SDRAM DDR2 800 (PC2 6400) Dual Channel Kit Desktop Memory - Desktop Memory
Why? What's the best 6400 RAM:? Is it this? Newegg.com - G.SKILL PI Black 4GB (2 x 2GB) 240-Pin DDR2 SDRAM DDR2 800 (PC2 6400) Dual Channel Kit Desktop Memory - Desktop Memory
Puddle Jumper Mod Emeritus Messages 4,292 Nov 2, 2008 #29 ^^ Those are certainly good and I would say they are one of the best.
1 1337_JohnN 1337 §tatus Messages 574 Location Southern California Nov 2, 2008 #30 Is that why they're so expensive? Would it OC to 1200?