RAID 1 vs RAID 0 - Page 2 - Techist - Tech Forum

Go Back   Techist - Tech Forum > Computer Hardware > New Systems | Building and Buying
Click Here to Login
Closed Thread
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 08-11-2006, 11:49 AM   #11 (permalink)
Wizard Techie
HAVOC's Avatar
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Milford, Connecticut
Posts: 4,218
Send a message via AIM to HAVOC Send a message via Yahoo to HAVOC

I still can't understand why people continue to consider RAID 0 arrays for "performance".

Hard drives are by far the #1 "hardware" bottleneck in PC's today. Getting and extra 5% increase in performance isn't going to drastically change overall system performance.

RAID 0 - is good for taking 2 small inexpensive drives and combined them to make one larger inexpensive drive.

a. WD Caviar SE @200GB = $75 x 2 = $150
b. WD Caviar SE @400GB = $190 x 1

Save $40 in RAID - 0 while using another 20w from PSU adding heat and also taking up more space in your case.

RAID 1 - like mentioned above is excellent to secure important data incase of 1 drive failure.

So (a.) would still give you 200GB but it would secure the data
(b.) you'd be SOL if the drive fails.

HAVOC is offline  
Closed Thread

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off

Copyright 2002- Social Knowledge, LLC All Rights Reserved.

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:29 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2018, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.