Quad SLi 7900GX2 Benchmarks - Page 2 - Techist - Tech Forum

Go Back   Techist - Tech Forum > Computer Hardware > New Systems | Building and Buying
Click Here to Login
Closed Thread
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 05-01-2006, 04:57 PM   #11 (permalink)
Field Engineer
SHAWN's Avatar
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Long Island, NY
Posts: 4,697
Send a message via AIM to SHAWN

Waste of money IMO.

A+, Network + , HP Certified Tech and MCP

Specs: AMD Phenom II X6 1095T, Asus M477TD, 8GB GSkill Ripjaws DDR3 1600 7-8-7-24 1T, 128GB Crucial M4 SSD, ATi HD4650, W7, 27" HL272 Monitor
SHAWN is offline  
Old 05-01-2006, 05:20 PM   #12 (permalink)
Master Techie
RicoDirenzo's Avatar
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 2,102

Originally posted by SHAWN
Waste of money IMO.
Like I said above: These new games are all about graphic realism not gameplay, at least for deathmatch tourny pro. For Example: FEAR, which is graphically spectacular, is stupid in single player...the same old first person shooter stupidity and lags like **** in multiplayer................it's time to bring back quake 1 with punkbuster installed on all the servers!!!! No wonder painkiller is the gamers DM choice right now!

Noli Nothis Permittere Te Terere!!
EVGA 680i, Dual EVGA 8800GT'S (650/950), 4 gigs OCZ DDR2 1066, Intel Q9450 at 3.8 Ghz, Koolance Water Cooled, Dual Plextor16x DL DVD+/-RW. Dual WD 250gb 16mb Cache Sata 3.0. 3DMark06 score = 19,168.
RicoDirenzo is offline  
Old 05-01-2006, 06:36 PM   #13 (permalink)
Newb Techie
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Michigan
Posts: 28

Lol..... gaming noobs........ BTW, FEAR sucked......how bout a single shot sniper rifle...biggest waste of 50 bux. I dont lag at all, I just hate the weapons.
That test is full of BS. The mobo they are using to test the quad sli setup doesnt support multi GPU cards. I have that same board, it specifcally stated that it doesnt. And really there is no software out that can truly optimize 2 cards let alone 4. Id say read a 3dmark test in about 6months I bet youll have way different results.
P-Zero is offline  
Old 05-01-2006, 08:14 PM   #14 (permalink)
Wizard Techie
HAVOC's Avatar
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Milford, Connecticut
Posts: 4,218
Send a message via AIM to HAVOC Send a message via Yahoo to HAVOC

Originally posted by P-Zero
BTW, FEAR sucked
Are you refering to multiplayer or singleplayer?

because Mulitplayer does suck. single player is cool from a eye candy prospective. Lot's of cool neat effects... lot's to go ooh, ahhh over.
HAVOC is offline  
Old 05-01-2006, 08:36 PM   #15 (permalink)
Monster Techie
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 1,306
Send a message via AIM to Brtnboarder495

So it's really a matter of Quanity>Quality I guess, since your getting more GPU's, but they're actually slower than the individual 7900GT's ... interesing.

My guess for the reason is that they needed to keep the heat down since the video cards are so close. SLI as a technology isn't mature enough yet and not worth it yet, and IMO there's no way this is even close.
Brtnboarder495 is offline  
Old 05-01-2006, 09:47 PM   #16 (permalink)
Ultra Techie
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 969

What boggles me is, why don't they put 2 GPUs on 1 board? Waste of space in my opinion.
<br><br><font color=\"black\"><b>There's No Place Like </b></font><font color=\"red\"><b></b></font><br>
AnthraX is offline  
Old 05-02-2006, 12:24 AM   #17 (permalink)
I poop on the rug
NosBoost300's Avatar
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Bellflower, CA
Posts: 10,218

hrmmm gaming noobs.... hrmm... well when i think of technology, i think of getting better.. not playing games that look like complete crap..... jagged edges bug the **** outta me when i come to think technology has gotten this far and still can't do that... not that i'd go quad sli.. i'm just saying, i like to have SMOOTH edges, i want a more life like feel to a game, and jagged edges certainly does not give that to me
Current Build:
Intel 8700k | 16GB G.skill Trident Z | Z370 Gigabyte Auros Gaming Extreme |
Asus GTX1080 Strix | Corsair H100i V2 | Corsair 750D | Corsair RM850X
NosBoost300 is offline  
Old 05-02-2006, 12:30 AM   #18 (permalink)
Lord Techie
gurusan's Avatar
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 6,562
Send a message via MSN to gurusan

4x AA has been perfect for me. How much better is 32x?
|| 2500K @ 5GHz 1 thread, 4.8 2 threads, 4.6 3, 4.5 4 1.284V ||
|| P8P67-M Pro || 8GB @ 2133MHz ||
|| 5850 @ 1000/1225 || XFX 650W || Silverstone FT03B ||
|| 37" LCD TV || CM Hyper 212+ || Samsung 2.1 Soundbar ||
gurusan is offline  
Old 05-02-2006, 01:22 AM   #19 (permalink)
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 5,191

yeah i cant get used to the gameplay in quake 4, its too slow and to fluid, i prefer the quake 3 engine better... i play ET all the time

hopefully enemy territory : quake wars will have better gameplay
The General is offline  
Old 05-02-2006, 12:38 PM   #20 (permalink)
True Techie
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 236

That is freaking insane, 32x AA! O_o


Main Rig
/// Intel Core 2 Duo E6600 at 3.8 ghz /// 512MB Nvidia 7900GT Gainward Golden Sample \'Goes Like **** Edition\' /// OCZ 2GB (2 x 1GB) PC5300 Dual Channel Gold GX XTC Series /// Intel Extreme D975bx-304 975X Mobo /// 2x Western Digital Raptor X 150GB in RAID 0 /// OCZ GameXStream 700w Silent SLI Ready ATX2 Power Supply ///
Light Rig : /// Intel Core 2 DUO E6300 /// Intel DP965LT 965 (Socket 775) PCI-Express DDR2 Motherboard /// Corsair 2GB DDR2 Value Select PC5300 /// Sapphire ATI Radeon X1900 GT 256MB ///
LU4sTrooper is offline  
Closed Thread

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off

Copyright 2002- Social Knowledge, LLC All Rights Reserved.

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:22 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2018, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.