On all benchmark test, for the CPU ones on Everest, the Q6600 nearly doubles the score compared to the E6600 both stocks.
Also..... Heres a comparison between a Q6600 vs E6600 on Everest Memory & Cache Benchmarks....
E6600 OC'ed to 3.2GHz with 2GB RAM.
Settings: 400MHz x 8 VCore: 1.3625; 2GB G.Skill-HZ RAM @ 1000MHz 5-5-5-15 1.9Volts
Q6600 OC'ed to 3.0GHz with 2GB RAM
Settings: 333MHz x 9 VCore: 1.3Volts; 2GB G.Skill-HZ RAM @ 1000MHz 5-5-5-15 1.9Volts
These are mainly Memory Benchmark on Everest so the higher the FSB = The better the Score despite the CPU's actual speed.
Edit: So why is Q6600 better than E6600? Darn, wonder if the choice I made for switching was good or not
Also..... Heres a comparison between a Q6600 vs E6600 on Everest Memory & Cache Benchmarks....
E6600 OC'ed to 3.2GHz with 2GB RAM.
Settings: 400MHz x 8 VCore: 1.3625; 2GB G.Skill-HZ RAM @ 1000MHz 5-5-5-15 1.9Volts
Q6600 OC'ed to 3.0GHz with 2GB RAM
Settings: 333MHz x 9 VCore: 1.3Volts; 2GB G.Skill-HZ RAM @ 1000MHz 5-5-5-15 1.9Volts
These are mainly Memory Benchmark on Everest so the higher the FSB = The better the Score despite the CPU's actual speed.
Edit: So why is Q6600 better than E6600? Darn, wonder if the choice I made for switching was good or not