M maroon1 Banned Messages 3,479 Jul 16, 2007 #11 Just get E6550 or E6750, they cost about the same, but they consume much less power and they overclock way much better than 6000+
Just get E6550 or E6750, they cost about the same, but they consume much less power and they overclock way much better than 6000+
Apokalipse Golden Master Messages 14,559 Location Melbourne, Australia Jul 16, 2007 #12 maroon1 said: Just get E6550 or E6750, they cost about the same, but they consume much less power and they overclock way much better than 6000+ Click to expand... no, they cost much more. And they're nowhere near as "much better" as people make them out to be. 6000+ is about equal to E6600
maroon1 said: Just get E6550 or E6750, they cost about the same, but they consume much less power and they overclock way much better than 6000+ Click to expand... no, they cost much more. And they're nowhere near as "much better" as people make them out to be. 6000+ is about equal to E6600
veg1992 Golden Master Messages 19,993 Jul 16, 2007 #13 isn't the e6550 around 150 this sunday? and e6750 $183? and apparently u haven't seen the e6750 hit 3.92ghz on stock intel cooling
isn't the e6550 around 150 this sunday? and e6750 $183? and apparently u haven't seen the e6750 hit 3.92ghz on stock intel cooling
Apokalipse Golden Master Messages 14,559 Location Melbourne, Australia Jul 16, 2007 #14 vernong1992 said: isn't the e6550 around 150 this sunday? and e6750 $183? Click to expand... isn't the 6000+, which is about equal to the E6600, less than $170 right now? and apparently u haven't seen the e6750 hit 3.92ghz on stock intel cooling Click to expand... Apparently you haven't seen the statistics.
vernong1992 said: isn't the e6550 around 150 this sunday? and e6750 $183? Click to expand... isn't the 6000+, which is about equal to the E6600, less than $170 right now? and apparently u haven't seen the e6750 hit 3.92ghz on stock intel cooling Click to expand... Apparently you haven't seen the statistics.
veg1992 Golden Master Messages 19,993 Jul 16, 2007 #15 Apokalipse said: isn't the 6000+, which is about equal to the E6600, less than $170 right now? Apparently you haven't seen the statistics. Click to expand... meh, true u cornered me, but i reread the article, its was unstable at .92, they went to 3.8, but nothing a good ole' DS3r can't fix
Apokalipse said: isn't the 6000+, which is about equal to the E6600, less than $170 right now? Apparently you haven't seen the statistics. Click to expand... meh, true u cornered me, but i reread the article, its was unstable at .92, they went to 3.8, but nothing a good ole' DS3r can't fix
Apokalipse Golden Master Messages 14,559 Location Melbourne, Australia Jul 16, 2007 #16 vernong1992 said: meh, true u cornered me, but i reread the article, its was unstable at .92, they went to 3.8, but nothing a good ole' DS3r can't fix Click to expand... I don't think a DS3 will automatically make it more stable
vernong1992 said: meh, true u cornered me, but i reread the article, its was unstable at .92, they went to 3.8, but nothing a good ole' DS3r can't fix Click to expand... I don't think a DS3 will automatically make it more stable
veg1992 Golden Master Messages 19,993 Jul 16, 2007 #17 Apokalipse said: I don't think a DS3 will automatically make it more stable Click to expand... thats ds3r (u know the p35 chipset)
Apokalipse said: I don't think a DS3 will automatically make it more stable Click to expand... thats ds3r (u know the p35 chipset)
Apokalipse Golden Master Messages 14,559 Location Melbourne, Australia Jul 16, 2007 #18 vernong1992 said: thats ds3r (u know the p35 chipset) Click to expand... okay, different chipset. Still, I don't think the stability of the chip is going to change with the motherboard if it is already able to reach 3.8+
vernong1992 said: thats ds3r (u know the p35 chipset) Click to expand... okay, different chipset. Still, I don't think the stability of the chip is going to change with the motherboard if it is already able to reach 3.8+
M maroon1 Banned Messages 3,479 Jul 16, 2007 #19 no, they cost much more. And they're nowhere near as "much better" as people make them out to be. Click to expand... E6550 is going to cost $163 E6750 is going to cost $183
no, they cost much more. And they're nowhere near as "much better" as people make them out to be. Click to expand... E6550 is going to cost $163 E6750 is going to cost $183
M maroon1 Banned Messages 3,479 Jul 16, 2007 #20 E6550 and E6600 are very close in performance. E6550 is only 66MHz slower than E6600, but it has faster FSB.
E6550 and E6600 are very close in performance. E6550 is only 66MHz slower than E6600, but it has faster FSB.