Intel Vs AMD - Page 6 - Techist - Tech Forum

Go Back   Techist - Tech Forum > Computer Hardware > New Systems | Building and Buying
Click Here to Login
Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
 
Old 06-17-2007, 01:14 AM   #51 (permalink)
Camera junky
 
Poizen22's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: ottawa ontario canada.
Posts: 6,280
Default Re: Intel Vs AMD

yes but they went down in price 6 months after wards the e6300 when first released was about 304 the e6400 was close to 400 and the e6600 was about 600$ so they were relitively expensive at release and amd made the price cut about 2 weeks after the release of the c2d and they were a lot cheaper buy that point and people were still buying the c2d even tho they were crazy expensive the c2d wasnt as cheap as it is now and the same will go for the new amd k10 chip if it is faster intel is making price cuts and people will still buy the k10 chips as they will be the faster ones just as people did with the c2d
__________________

__________________

https://www.flickr.com/photos/poizen22/
intel Core I7 8700k@ 5.0ghz-Nvidia GTX1080 ti ftw3-Aorus 5 z370 mobo-16gb ddr4 G-Skill trident Z rgb 3000mhz - 1tb samsung 960 pro, 2tb wd blue- thermaltake rgb 750w gold-Phanteks pro M TG- Samsung CHG70 1440p 144hz 32 inch QLED.
Poizen22 is offline  
Old 06-17-2007, 04:56 AM   #52 (permalink)
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 3,479
Default Re: Intel Vs AMD

Quote:
yes but they went down in price 6 months after wards the e6300 when first released was about 304 the e6400 was close to 400 and the e6600 was about 600$
Not true, not at all

When E6300 came out on July 27 it was $183, E6400 was $224, E6600 was $316, E6700 was $530 and X6800 was $999


Quote:
people were still buying the c2d even tho they were crazy expensive
When C2D first came out, E6600 which was priced $316 only at that time was able to destroy the more expensive AMD FX62 which was the best AMD processor at that time.

I wouldn't say that C2D were "crazy expensive"
__________________

maroon1 is offline  
Old 06-17-2007, 10:37 AM   #53 (permalink)
The Bulldog
 
zmatt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: In an empty Ramen packet
Posts: 4,660
Default Re: Intel Vs AMD

well until i get a better job $312 is more than i would spend on a cpu.... I payed $155 for my opty 165 and now its something like $103
__________________

__________________


ポップ・タルトが大好きです。
<<<<<<<Rep is always welcome
Ultimate Guitar exercises/ Songs for technique
zmatt is offline  
Closed Thread

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
AMD X2 5600+ v Intel E6300 zmatt Overclocking and Modding 32 06-09-2007 02:54 PM
Intel entering the graphic card market? b1gapl New Systems | Building and Buying 12 06-08-2007 07:11 AM
8 Intel Cores Faster Than 16 AMD Cores? Osiris Overclocking and Modding 9 05-28-2007 08:47 PM
Intel future processors will be lead-free and environmentally friendly maroon1 New Systems | Building and Buying 2 05-23-2007 11:25 AM
Intel will lower the Q6600 Power Consumption on 16th of July maroon1 New Systems | Building and Buying 0 05-01-2007 08:38 AM



Copyright 2002- Social Knowledge, LLC All Rights Reserved.

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:05 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.