intel plans quad core chip for 2006 - Techist - Tech Forum

Go Back   Techist - Tech Forum > Computer Hardware > New Systems | Building and Buying
Closed Thread
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 09-26-2006, 10:06 PM   #1 (permalink)
True Techie
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 135
Default intel plans quad core chip for 2006

yahoo news

70% faster then current chips! wow that is amazing, thought u guys should know...

Pentium 4 630 (3.0ghz)
1 gb PNY DDR2700
ATI 9600XT 128 mb
Hitachi 160 gb
ABIT AS8 Socket T (LGA 775)
bronxblaza117 is offline  
Old 09-26-2006, 10:10 PM   #2 (permalink)
Super Techie
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 298

Quad core? And I thought dual-core snuck up on us. :P


See Wii. See Wii run. See Wii blow all the other consoles out of the water!
KBlair is offline  
Old 09-26-2006, 11:17 PM   #3 (permalink)
True Techie
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 223

I think I've waited long enough for an upgrade. Im less than a month away from building my Intel Core 2 Duo.
i5 3570k (OC to 4.2 mhz)
Geforce 650 Ti Boost 2gb
Windows 7
Da11en47 is offline  
Old 09-27-2006, 05:39 AM   #4 (permalink)
Mod Emeritus
b1gapl's Avatar
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: USA
Posts: 13,044

Wow and I thought C2D beats everything now this? and a 70% increase? wow...


b1gapl is offline  
Old 09-27-2006, 07:11 AM   #5 (permalink)
Master Techie
aliasaid's Avatar
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 2,400

im calling a bluff on intel. remember that story they made up on how some "conroe" chip was supposed to be way better than the athlon 64? this is another example of intel manipulating the media. whether the chips are actually better or not is completely irrelevent... its all based on intentions...

oh, and to satisfy DMo.. "[/sarcasm]"

"Is virtue a thing remote? I wish to be virtuous, and lo! Virtue is at hand." -Confucius
aliasaid is offline  
Old 09-27-2006, 08:46 AM   #6 (permalink)
Wizard Techie
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 3,312

Originally posted by aliasaid
remember that story they made up on how some "conroe" chip was supposed to be way better than the athlon 64?
Lol, it is. Does the E6300 not whip the FX-62 when overclocked on stock cooling?

Mabey it's a good thing I didn't jump on conroe. I see quad cores in my future.
so, umm, err yeah
003 is offline  
Old 09-27-2006, 09:17 AM   #7 (permalink)
Super Techie
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 262

Good. Now I can buy a Conroe for even cheaper.
viperman5000 is offline  
Old 09-27-2006, 10:47 AM   #8 (permalink)
Techie Beyond Description
Apokalipse's Avatar
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 14,556

the Core 2 Quad's as they will be called, are actually just two core 2 duo die's stuck on the one chip. it's nothing special.

on the other hand, AMD is making true quad core CPU's, along with a lot of other stuff.

* 65nm die size

* improved DDR2 memory controller, and future support for DDR3

* improved architecture for more instructions per clock

* double the floating point units (it'll be about 1.5 times better in floating point instructions on average)

* another instruction decoder (total of four)
- note that the conroe does have 4 instruction decoders, but 3 are for simple instructions and one is for complex instructions. While AMD's three (K8) or four (K8L) decoders are for both simple and complex instructions

* improved transistor design (altering the shape for more surface area without a bigger footprint size)

* the use of Silicon-Germanium tranaistors - this has yet to be confirmed, but IBM did get these transistors to 350GHZ at room temperature.

* the possible use of Z-RAM (zero capacitor) - which is about 5 times as dense as current SRAM used in today's CPU cache.
this hasn't been confirmed for K8L specifically. though AMD will be using it in future.
Apokalipse is offline  
Old 09-27-2006, 10:52 AM   #9 (permalink)
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 5,191

Mind telling me what difference it makes to have 4 cores on one die versus 2 dies with 2 cores each? Also, whats "nothing special" about 2 dual core dies on one chip? It's a lot more "special" than a dual socket motherboard with two dual core processors... (in reference to AMD's quad-core plan)
The General is offline  
Old 09-27-2006, 10:55 AM   #10 (permalink)
Techie Beyond Description
Apokalipse's Avatar
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 14,556

better communication between the cores themselves, and the hypertransport bus will be a lot better going to just the one die instead of two.

the one die is necessary for AMD, because they are planning to put level 3 cache into the CPU's, shared by all 4 cores


and as for the 4x4 and stuff:
4 x 4 means the ability to put 4 quad cores in one PC.

no, they're not aiming it at gamers and such.
they're aiming it at server PC's. it'll be good for businesses (not the end user, because it is too expensive for even high-end gamers)

it means more cores in one PC, which = less PC's for a certain number of cores

and they're also trying to focus heavily on low power consumption per core

that means less physical CPU's, and less systems, but more actual cores, and a lot better power consumption.

not to mention, with less systems, that means less maintenance, therefore less costs.

so for businesses, 4x4 means better all round on price/performance.

Apokalipse is offline  
Closed Thread

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off

Our Communities

Our communities encompass many different hobbies and interests, but each one is built on friendly, intelligent membership.

» More about our Communities

Automotive Communities

Our Automotive communities encompass many different makes and models. From U.S. domestics to European Saloons.

» More about our Automotive Communities

Marine Communities

Our Marine websites focus on Cruising and Sailing Vessels, including forums and the largest cruising Wiki project on the web today.

» More about our Marine Communities

Copyright 2002-2015 Social Knowledge, LLC All Rights Reserved.

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:01 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2016, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.