Poizen22 Camera junky Messages 6,283 Location ottawa ontario canada. Oct 4, 2008 #21 il post screenies in one moment no word of a lie i get 50fps and everything i have is in my sig, anyone with a 4870 care to opose me?
il post screenies in one moment no word of a lie i get 50fps and everything i have is in my sig, anyone with a 4870 care to opose me?
zmatt The Bulldog Messages 4,660 Location In an empty Ramen packet Oct 4, 2008 #22 I just checked the benchmark thread. There aren't any 4 series gpus there.
Poizen22 Camera junky Messages 6,283 Location ottawa ontario canada. Oct 4, 2008 #23 ricoh got 41fps with his q6600 at 3.0 and a hd4870 Ric0h said: Am I doing something wrong? I got q6600 (to 3.0ghz) And 4870 512 GDDR5 And I got 41 FPS average (no AA) Click to expand... http://www.techist.com/forums/f10/t...ysis-gpu-benchmark-thread-162750/index20.html last post on the page
ricoh got 41fps with his q6600 at 3.0 and a hd4870 Ric0h said: Am I doing something wrong? I got q6600 (to 3.0ghz) And 4870 512 GDDR5 And I got 41 FPS average (no AA) Click to expand... http://www.techist.com/forums/f10/t...ysis-gpu-benchmark-thread-162750/index20.html last post on the page
Poizen22 Camera junky Messages 6,283 Location ottawa ontario canada. Oct 4, 2008 #25 1280x1024, and that what the gpu bench is supose to be at 1280x1024 gurusan said: 1 | 72.160 | khemist | intel e8500 @ 4242mhz | nvidia gtx 280 1024mb @ 720/2580/1480 | Windows XP 32bit 2 | 68.240 | GoRedwings19 | intel e8200 @ 4000mhz | nvidia gtx 280gtx 1024mb @ 687/1301/1390 | Windows XP 64bit 3 | 62.170 | rounddodger | intel e6600 @ 3501mhz | nvidia gtx 280 1024mb @ 722/2600/1500 | Windows XP 32bit 4 | 60.520 | Montegue | intel q6600 @ 3312mhz | nvidia gtx 280 1024mb @ 702/1215/1500 | Windows Vista 64bit 5 | 55.770 | IceShock | intel e6600 @ 3762mhz | ati 4870x2 1024mb @ 750/900 | single card (dual gpu) | Windows XP 32bit 6 | 55.240 | LEEBONE | intel e6600 @ 3500mhz | nvidia 8800gtx 768mb @ 576/998/1506 | sli | Windows Vista 64bit 7 | 51.120 | gerard | intel q6600 @ 3600mhz | ati 4870x2 1024mb @ 750/900 | single card (dual gpu) | Windows Vista 64bit 8 | 48.650 | Metalface Mark | intel e8500 @ 4000mhz | nvidia 9800gtx+ 512mb @ 766/1900/1100 | Windows Vista 64bit 9 | 48.180 | steve258 | intel q6600 @ 3330mhz | nvidia 9800gx2 1024mb @ 745/2100/1862 | single card (dual gpu) | Windows Vista 64bit 10 | 44.940 | Holwill | intel q6600 @ 3600mhz | ati 4870 512mb @ 840/955 | Windows Vista 64bit 11 | 44.850 | RavenXXX2 | intel q6600 @ 3600mhz | ati 4870 512mb @ 795/1050 | Windows Vista 64bit 12 | 44.150 | Devious | intel e8600 @ 4500mhz | ati 4850 512mb @ 700/1150 | crossfire | Windows Vista 32bit 13 | 43.130 | Bradley8988 | intel e8600 @ 4100mhz | ati 4870 512mb @ 790/1100 | crossfire | Windows Vista 64bit 14 | 42.200 | RaV | intel q6600 @ 3200mhz | nvidia 8800gt 512mb @ 700/1014/1750 | Windows XP 32bit 15 | 41.510 | gurusan | intel e8500 @ 4352mhz | ati 4850 512mb @ 845/1150 | Windows 2008 64bit 16 | 40.840 | mks2005 | intel e8500 @ 4209mhz | ati 4850 512mb @ 780/1000 | Windows Vista 32bit 17 | 40.770 | HummuH1 | intel q6600 @ 3402mhz | nvidia 8800gtx 768mb @ 620/1910/1453 | Windows Vista 32bit 18 | 39.290 | marc2003 | intel q6600 @ 3420mhz | ati 4850 512mb @ 625/993 | Windows XP 64bit 19 | 39.090 | RobRX-7 | intel e6550 @ 3318mhz | nvidia 8800gt 512mb @ 700/1000/1750 | Windows XP 32bit 20 | 31.120 | grudas | amd athlon 64 x2 5000+ @ 3107mhz | nvidia 8800gt 512mb @ 700/1000/1751 | Windows XP 32bit here are some warhead scores to show you how terrible ati are at crysis... :/ Click to expand... in that there is a 9800gtx's with similar clocks to my 8800gts outpacing 2 hd4870s and one setup is in crossfire.
1280x1024, and that what the gpu bench is supose to be at 1280x1024 gurusan said: 1 | 72.160 | khemist | intel e8500 @ 4242mhz | nvidia gtx 280 1024mb @ 720/2580/1480 | Windows XP 32bit 2 | 68.240 | GoRedwings19 | intel e8200 @ 4000mhz | nvidia gtx 280gtx 1024mb @ 687/1301/1390 | Windows XP 64bit 3 | 62.170 | rounddodger | intel e6600 @ 3501mhz | nvidia gtx 280 1024mb @ 722/2600/1500 | Windows XP 32bit 4 | 60.520 | Montegue | intel q6600 @ 3312mhz | nvidia gtx 280 1024mb @ 702/1215/1500 | Windows Vista 64bit 5 | 55.770 | IceShock | intel e6600 @ 3762mhz | ati 4870x2 1024mb @ 750/900 | single card (dual gpu) | Windows XP 32bit 6 | 55.240 | LEEBONE | intel e6600 @ 3500mhz | nvidia 8800gtx 768mb @ 576/998/1506 | sli | Windows Vista 64bit 7 | 51.120 | gerard | intel q6600 @ 3600mhz | ati 4870x2 1024mb @ 750/900 | single card (dual gpu) | Windows Vista 64bit 8 | 48.650 | Metalface Mark | intel e8500 @ 4000mhz | nvidia 9800gtx+ 512mb @ 766/1900/1100 | Windows Vista 64bit 9 | 48.180 | steve258 | intel q6600 @ 3330mhz | nvidia 9800gx2 1024mb @ 745/2100/1862 | single card (dual gpu) | Windows Vista 64bit 10 | 44.940 | Holwill | intel q6600 @ 3600mhz | ati 4870 512mb @ 840/955 | Windows Vista 64bit 11 | 44.850 | RavenXXX2 | intel q6600 @ 3600mhz | ati 4870 512mb @ 795/1050 | Windows Vista 64bit 12 | 44.150 | Devious | intel e8600 @ 4500mhz | ati 4850 512mb @ 700/1150 | crossfire | Windows Vista 32bit 13 | 43.130 | Bradley8988 | intel e8600 @ 4100mhz | ati 4870 512mb @ 790/1100 | crossfire | Windows Vista 64bit 14 | 42.200 | RaV | intel q6600 @ 3200mhz | nvidia 8800gt 512mb @ 700/1014/1750 | Windows XP 32bit 15 | 41.510 | gurusan | intel e8500 @ 4352mhz | ati 4850 512mb @ 845/1150 | Windows 2008 64bit 16 | 40.840 | mks2005 | intel e8500 @ 4209mhz | ati 4850 512mb @ 780/1000 | Windows Vista 32bit 17 | 40.770 | HummuH1 | intel q6600 @ 3402mhz | nvidia 8800gtx 768mb @ 620/1910/1453 | Windows Vista 32bit 18 | 39.290 | marc2003 | intel q6600 @ 3420mhz | ati 4850 512mb @ 625/993 | Windows XP 64bit 19 | 39.090 | RobRX-7 | intel e6550 @ 3318mhz | nvidia 8800gt 512mb @ 700/1000/1750 | Windows XP 32bit 20 | 31.120 | grudas | amd athlon 64 x2 5000+ @ 3107mhz | nvidia 8800gt 512mb @ 700/1000/1751 | Windows XP 32bit here are some warhead scores to show you how terrible ati are at crysis... :/ Click to expand... in that there is a 9800gtx's with similar clocks to my 8800gts outpacing 2 hd4870s and one setup is in crossfire.
zmatt The Bulldog Messages 4,660 Location In an empty Ramen packet Oct 4, 2008 #26 Yeah and those 4870s happen to be in vista.
OP OP Stryker_77 Baseband Member Messages 91 Oct 4, 2008 #27 How will the hd4850 perform at 19" wide screen monitor?
zmatt The Bulldog Messages 4,660 Location In an empty Ramen packet Oct 4, 2008 #28 depends on what resolution you run it at. I ran the warhead benchmark app and this is what I got: Average of 37fps. I'm not going to run my cpu at 3.8 until the sunbeam comes in. This stock cooler has me worried.
depends on what resolution you run it at. I ran the warhead benchmark app and this is what I got: Average of 37fps. I'm not going to run my cpu at 3.8 until the sunbeam comes in. This stock cooler has me worried.
Poizen22 Camera junky Messages 6,283 Location ottawa ontario canada. Oct 4, 2008 #29 nvidia 9800gtx+ 512mb @ 766/1900/1100 | Windows Vista 64bit so is the 9800gtx
Puddle Jumper Mod Emeritus Messages 4,292 Oct 4, 2008 #30 zmatt said: depends on what resolution you run it at. I ran the warhead benchmark app and this is what I got: Average of 37fps. I'm not going to run my cpu at 3.8 until the sunbeam comes in. This stock cooler has me worried. Click to expand... He has a 19" wide screen so it's native res is most likely 1440X900. Can you run the benchmark at that resolution?
zmatt said: depends on what resolution you run it at. I ran the warhead benchmark app and this is what I got: Average of 37fps. I'm not going to run my cpu at 3.8 until the sunbeam comes in. This stock cooler has me worried. Click to expand... He has a 19" wide screen so it's native res is most likely 1440X900. Can you run the benchmark at that resolution?