Hd 4850 vs 9800 gtx+? Ur opinion? - Page 13 - Techist - Tech Forum

Go Back   Techist - Tech Forum > Computer Hardware > New Systems | Building and Buying
Click Here to Login
Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
 
Old 10-08-2008, 02:25 AM   #121 (permalink)
Master Techie
 
baron5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Australia
Posts: 2,984
Default Re: Hd 4850 vs 9800 gtx+? Ur opinion?

im interested to know how folding works on the cards, are all vertex, geometry and pixel shaders all used? or does it use unified shader instructions that are sent across all three types of shaders. the 4870 has like 800 shaders, even if it wasnt under stress shouldnt it be able to process more in folding by using unified shader instructions? or does this come back to idea of having different types of shaders between ati and nV
__________________

__________________
<<<Please give me Rep if I have helped you<<<

I7 930 @ 4GHz : Noctua D-14
Gigabyte X58A-UD7 : Asus GTX 480
G.Skill Trident 1600MHz 6-8-7-18 : Samsung F3 1TB
OCZ Vertex 2 50GB : Silverstone RV02 Case
Silverstone Strider Plus 1Kw : Sony DRU-870s Optical
Samsung P2350 Monito
r

baron5 is offline  
Old 10-08-2008, 04:40 AM   #122 (permalink)
Lord Techie
 
ricanflow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Euless, Tx
Posts: 6,317
Default Re: Hd 4850 vs 9800 gtx+? Ur opinion?

The shaders are used in the form of parallel processing.

The cards do work in 3d mode, but there is no 3d rendering going on, the client uses CUDA/CAL as the api for processing the work units.

CPU usage is very low because all the CPU does is feed the data, the calculations are done by the shaders.

ATI does have more shaders, but Nvidia shaders work faster even though theres less of them...so Nvidia cards are slightly faster (for now).

The first generation client ran off directx and, thus was much slower and nowhere near as stable. And it wasnt very accurate in terms of science either. Instead of shaders, it used pixel pipelines.

The fastest cards were the x1900 series, which could get a good 700ppd when oc'd.

Now, an 8600GT can do twice as much at stock speeds.
__________________

__________________
3DMARK06 = 20,341 (3.8GHZ)



Laptop
P7350 | GTX 260M | 4GB DDR2 800 | 320GB HD | X-Fi | Vista 64

Folding Rig/File Server

M775 | E1200 | Foxconn P9657AB
| Dual 8800GT | Antec NeoHE 500 | Barracuda 80GB | Wintec Ampx



ricanflow is offline  
Closed Thread

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Price vs performance: 9600gt vs. 9800 GTX Jtumble2 New Systems | Building and Buying 1 08-27-2008 09:06 PM
Current PSU inadequate for 9800 GTX, suggestions? gmeade1 System Upgrades 8 07-23-2008 10:21 PM
9800 GTX vs. SLI vs. 3-way SLI. vs. Quad SLI veg1992 New Technology and Products 2 05-31-2008 10:59 AM
9800 GTX Early Test! MaV II DARK II New Systems | Building and Buying 7 03-25-2008 05:49 PM
NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GTX Pics Osiris New Systems | Building and Buying 41 03-23-2008 01:27 AM



Copyright 2002- Social Knowledge, LLC All Rights Reserved.

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:02 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.