Graphics Performance List - Page 34 - Techist - Tech Forum

Go Back   Techist - Tech Forum > Computer Hardware > New Systems | Building and Buying
Click Here to Login
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
 
Old 07-24-2010, 01:09 AM   #331 (permalink)
Grandfather of Techist

¯\_(ツ)_/¯
 
Trotter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: The South
Posts: 31,307
Default Re: Graphics Performance List

Quote:
Originally Posted by Threadbare702 View Post
can anyone tell me how the GTX 460 compares on this list?
At a guess I would put it just under the 470, but no more than three maybe four slots down, max.
__________________

__________________


My Rig: SABLE
Antec 300 Illusion / Antec EarthWatts EA650 650W / ASUS GeForce GTX 960 GTX960-DC2OC-2GD5
AMD FX 8320 x8 Black Edition / Gelid Tranquillo / MSI 970A-G43
Sandisk Ultra Plus 128GB / Samsung 840 120GB / WD Black 750GB / WD Green 1TB
2x4GB DDR3 1600 - 2x2GB DDR3 1600
Win10 Ent 64-bit - Mionix Naos 7000 Mouse - CM Storm QuickFire Rapid Mech Keyboard


R.I.P. Danny L. Trotter ... 14 Nov 1945 - 4 Sept 2009
Trotter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-24-2010, 03:44 PM   #332 (permalink)
Super Techie
 
Yerfdog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 326
Default Re: Graphics Performance List

Quote:
Originally Posted by Threadbare702 View Post
can anyone tell me how the GTX 460 compares on this list?
From the benchmark I saw, it did just BARELY (a fraction of a frame to two frames) did worse than the GTX 280.
__________________

Yerfdog is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-25-2010, 12:19 AM   #333 (permalink)
Junior Techie
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 65
Default Re: Graphics Performance List

Hello! I would like to know where the IGP Radeon 4200 ranks in this list. Thank you!
JorgeHGPR is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-25-2010, 01:36 AM   #334 (permalink)
Grandfather of Techist

¯\_(ツ)_/¯
 
Trotter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: The South
Posts: 31,307
Default Re: Graphics Performance List

From what I could find, Jorge, the 4200 would fall around the #70 - #75 mark, somewhere between the performance of the X850XT, 7600GT, and the X1650XT. Of course the 4200 will be using some of your RAM to run so this can have an overall impact of your performance.
__________________


My Rig: SABLE
Antec 300 Illusion / Antec EarthWatts EA650 650W / ASUS GeForce GTX 960 GTX960-DC2OC-2GD5
AMD FX 8320 x8 Black Edition / Gelid Tranquillo / MSI 970A-G43
Sandisk Ultra Plus 128GB / Samsung 840 120GB / WD Black 750GB / WD Green 1TB
2x4GB DDR3 1600 - 2x2GB DDR3 1600
Win10 Ent 64-bit - Mionix Naos 7000 Mouse - CM Storm QuickFire Rapid Mech Keyboard


R.I.P. Danny L. Trotter ... 14 Nov 1945 - 4 Sept 2009
Trotter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-25-2010, 01:43 AM   #335 (permalink)
Junior Techie
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 65
Default Re: Graphics Performance List

Thanks for the reply Trotter!

One more thing, I have a question regarding:

Quote:
Of course the 4200 will be using some of your RAM to run so this can have an overall impact of your performance.
Is this the same case with the IGP Intel GMA X4500?
JorgeHGPR is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-25-2010, 01:48 AM   #336 (permalink)
Grandfather of Techist

¯\_(ツ)_/¯
 
Trotter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: The South
Posts: 31,307
Default Re: Graphics Performance List

Any and all IGP use some of the system's RAM. Some mobos have some inbuild RAM for graphics, but not much. Anything else the IGP needs it uses from the system. That's why a laptop or prebuilt will say "such-and-such shared RAM" as it is shared between the CPU and IGP.

That's the beauty of MOST graphics cards (a few will also use system RAM). They have their own onboard memory just for their use, thus leaving all the system RAM free for the system.
__________________


My Rig: SABLE
Antec 300 Illusion / Antec EarthWatts EA650 650W / ASUS GeForce GTX 960 GTX960-DC2OC-2GD5
AMD FX 8320 x8 Black Edition / Gelid Tranquillo / MSI 970A-G43
Sandisk Ultra Plus 128GB / Samsung 840 120GB / WD Black 750GB / WD Green 1TB
2x4GB DDR3 1600 - 2x2GB DDR3 1600
Win10 Ent 64-bit - Mionix Naos 7000 Mouse - CM Storm QuickFire Rapid Mech Keyboard


R.I.P. Danny L. Trotter ... 14 Nov 1945 - 4 Sept 2009
Trotter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-28-2010, 02:06 AM   #337 (permalink)
Newb Techie
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 4
Default Re: Graphics Performance List

For whoever is working on the laptop graphics list, would you mind helping me with a little question? I wanted to know if the nVidia Geforce GT330M could stack up against the ATI Radeon Mobility 5650. I'm choosing between two laptops as of right now, and it might come down to that. Thanks for your time. Oh and one more thing! If its not too much trouble, would you mind speculating how the GT330M would handle Starcraft2 or Diablo 3 with an i7-720 and 4GB DDR3 RAM, 500 GB HDD? Thank you!!
-Davidd
Davidd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-28-2010, 02:17 AM   #338 (permalink)

Triforcer
 
Baez's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 6,987
Default Re: Graphics Performance List

The 5650 beats the 330M by a margin. Either card can handle SC2 and probably D3 on low-medium settings.
__________________


Baez is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-28-2010, 03:19 AM   #339 (permalink)
Techie Beyond Description
 
Apokalipse's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 14,559
Default Re: Graphics Performance List

judging by the shader count (5650M with 400 shaders, GT 330M with 48) I would say the 5650 is better
Of course, you can't directly compare shaders. But considering ATI GPU's with 320 shaders approximately compared to Nvidia GPU's with ~96-128 shaders, the Nvidia GPU would have to be clocked relatively high in comparision to get close
__________________
Apokalipse is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-05-2010, 04:52 PM   #340 (permalink)
Wizard Techie
 
Druid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 3,065
Default Re: Graphics Performance List

Quote:
Originally Posted by Yerfdog View Post
From the benchmark I saw, it did just BARELY (a fraction of a frame to two frames) did worse than the GTX 280.
Hmmm. From what I've seen it seems to be better than the 280. It seems to be about like a 285.
__________________

__________________
CPU: Intel Core i7 920
GPU: ASUS STRIX GTX 970
Ram: 12GB 1600 Mhz DDR3
Mobo: ASUS P6T
PSU: 750W PC Power & Cooling
Druid is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
GPU folding performance list. Luke Folding @ Home 38 03-28-2009 10:09 AM
Team Fortress 2 performance is horrible on my computer SamLee0519 New Systems | Building and Buying 8 03-09-2009 07:49 AM
ATI Unveils World’s First Graphics Processors Made Using 40nm Process Technology Trotter New Technology and Products 2 03-03-2009 10:07 PM
Graphics cards won't work ??? Inigo_Montoya Hardware Repairs and Troubleshooting 6 02-17-2008 10:54 PM
Dialup Speed, Tweaking slow performance SpenceQ Overclocking and Modding 8 12-01-2007 03:12 PM



Copyright 2002- Social Knowledge, LLC All Rights Reserved.

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:07 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.