lazer_viking
In Runtime
- Messages
- 471
I'm thinking about selling my trusty old fx-57 for a x2 4800+? What do you guys think? I made this decision shortly after my fx-57 scored ~5000 mflops on a benchmark and my friends x2 4400+ scored somewhere above 14000 mflops. Even now, I don't understand why he beat me so badly, almost tripled my score. Wth? Maybe I'm under estimating the power of dual core? Or the the fact he had 64kb more of L1 cache? Would that really affect the score that much? Because the equation "2.2 GHz + 2.2 GHz = 4.4 GHz = not 3.0GHz(3)" (my fx-57 is OC'd 200MHz). I know that right now, for gaming, an fx-57 wins, but later on down the road the dual core is going to own and my fx-57 isn't exactly increasing in value...... lol........ *a tear falls*.
I didn't know dual core had that much of an advantage or I would've went with a dual core right away.
Some more questions I have about dual core would be stuff like.... Can Windows XP utilize the dual coreness? Like, for example, I do a LOT of video transcoding (every week another Naruto and Bleach episode comes out and I have to transcode it for my ipod. It takes a good 8-10 minutes with my OC'd fx-57) and file compression (usually ~2 GB at a time... so it's a lot).
Any thoughts?
I didn't know dual core had that much of an advantage or I would've went with a dual core right away.
Some more questions I have about dual core would be stuff like.... Can Windows XP utilize the dual coreness? Like, for example, I do a LOT of video transcoding (every week another Naruto and Bleach episode comes out and I have to transcode it for my ipod. It takes a good 8-10 minutes with my OC'd fx-57) and file compression (usually ~2 GB at a time... so it's a lot).
Any thoughts?