First Build: Mediocre Setup - Page 3 - Techist - Tech Forum

Go Back   Techist - Tech Forum > Computer Hardware > New Systems | Building and Buying
Click Here to Login
Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
 
Old 11-29-2006, 12:49 PM   #21 (permalink)
disgruntled ex-moderator
 
Nagasama's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: probably on the lake
Posts: 6,956
Default

okay, i gotcha
__________________

__________________
"nagasama no longer drinks tecate, or streaks out of the night for anything, and he has a fine wife so he has no use for your girlfriend...she is safe..."
Nagasama is offline  
Old 11-29-2006, 01:31 PM   #22 (permalink)
Super Techie
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 258
Send a message via AIM to KNiGHTMaRe89
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by fade2black2004
AMD wont having anything to compete withe C2D until Q3 of 2007 and by then Intel's 45nm technology will be out
from what i read, even though AMD is about 6-8 months behind Intels comp., they plan to release something big when they do release it.
__________________

KNiGHTMaRe89 is offline  
Old 11-29-2006, 01:37 PM   #23 (permalink)
disgruntled ex-moderator
 
Nagasama's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: probably on the lake
Posts: 6,956
Default

i read that too, and perhaps it will be nightmarishly awesome...
read it was to be am3 platform, but you could use an am3 cpu on an am2 socket...? hmmmmmmmmmm...
__________________
"nagasama no longer drinks tecate, or streaks out of the night for anything, and he has a fine wife so he has no use for your girlfriend...she is safe..."
Nagasama is offline  
Old 11-29-2006, 02:03 PM   #24 (permalink)
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 3,479
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by lancec2c30
I think the 4200 stock is 2.2, and the e6300 stock is 1.8. Like austin said if you oc a 4200 and a 6300 to 2.8, the 6300 has to oc .4 more ghz to get there.
What is your point ??

At stock speeds E6300 can easily beat X2 4200+
At stock speeds E6300 performs as good as X2 4600+

And E6300 can beat FX62 when you over clock it
maroon1 is offline  
Old 11-29-2006, 06:50 PM   #25 (permalink)
Newb Techie
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 22
Default

http://www23.tomshardware.com/cpu.ht...=433&chart=165

6400 is close enough to the 6300 IMO. So I just chose that, since they don't have a 6300 to choose.

Try it with different benchmarks.

Skizzy is offline  
Old 11-29-2006, 06:57 PM   #26 (permalink)
Future ex-member
 
lancec2c30's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Chehalis, WA
Posts: 4,012
Send a message via MSN to lancec2c30
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by maroon1
What is your point ??

At stock speeds E6300 can easily beat X2 4200+
At stock speeds E6300 performs as good as X2 4600+

And E6300 can beat FX62 when you over clock it
Why dont you read some more into the post, I was showing nagasma.
__________________

__________________

XP Pro | Vista Home Premium | Linux Ubuntu 7.10
s939 X2 3800 Toledo @ 2.6ghz | evga 7900gs | 320gig + 80gig wd | 1gb Ram | Abit KN8 SLI
3.1ghz achieved. :cool:
70K F@H member..............still waiting for the "iRACK"

Norcent will not be forgotten.

lancec2c30 is offline  
Closed Thread

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off




Copyright 2002- Social Knowledge, LLC All Rights Reserved.

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:47 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.