So heres the IGN Crysis review ( which praises crysis a lot ) IGN: Crysis Review
heres the Australian Crysis IGN review ( which is the exact opposite and really bags on crysis ) IGN: Crysis Review
whats I find to be such an anomaly is how they claim their test machine, a Core 2 Duo processor overclocked to 3.3GHz, 2GB of DDRII-800 memory, a GeForce 8800GTX and 680i SLI motherboard BARELY gets 25 FPS at MEDIUM settings at 1680 x 1050 with no anti-aliasing.
Now...the anomaly...I have a quad core processor OCed to 3.0 ghz, 2 gigs of ddr2 memory, and a single 8800 gtx and average about 37ish FPS on HIGH settings at the same resolution as them and no anti-aliasing....does something not make sense?
I'm guessing the problem that they didn't discover has to do with they were running Vista and DX 10. Anyone care to share their vista DX 10 experiences? Is it really that bad?
heres the Australian Crysis IGN review ( which is the exact opposite and really bags on crysis ) IGN: Crysis Review
whats I find to be such an anomaly is how they claim their test machine, a Core 2 Duo processor overclocked to 3.3GHz, 2GB of DDRII-800 memory, a GeForce 8800GTX and 680i SLI motherboard BARELY gets 25 FPS at MEDIUM settings at 1680 x 1050 with no anti-aliasing.
Now...the anomaly...I have a quad core processor OCed to 3.0 ghz, 2 gigs of ddr2 memory, and a single 8800 gtx and average about 37ish FPS on HIGH settings at the same resolution as them and no anti-aliasing....does something not make sense?
I'm guessing the problem that they didn't discover has to do with they were running Vista and DX 10. Anyone care to share their vista DX 10 experiences? Is it really that bad?