Puddle Jumper
Mod Emeritus
- Messages
- 4,292
Never said a 7750/7850 was top of the line, that would be pretty foolish. But a bottleneck is a bottleneck. Any really nice video card will still be bottlenecked by the Celeron, not so much for Crysis requirements.
Besides, at 1024x768, a GTX 260 would be overkill if you ask me, the GTS 250 is more than enough to handle it, especially for that cost.
Aside form it's cache the e1400 is identical to the e2180 and since I have been running one of those for more than a year I feel I have a pretty good idea how the Celeron performs. At 2.8ghz which is 100% Intel Burn Test stable on stock voltage my e2180 can handle Crysis or any other game or application just fine. Since I'm not running a GTX 260 I can't comment on how it might be bottlenecked however I wouldn't let that possibility stop me from upgrading to one. Based on my experiences using a HD 4850 and a slower athlon x2 I doubt the GTS 250 would be bottleneck by the e1400 provided it was overclocked to at least 2.5ghz as I mentioned earlier.
The reason I pointed out the 7850 isn't a high end cpu is if he bought it he would essentially be switching one budget cpu for another, slightly faster, one. Besides if he got a good board and cooler for the e1400 it could likely be overclocked to equal the 7850's stock performance. I'm not debating the fact that the 7850 is better but I don't think it is worth the $135 upgrade price (mobo +cpu).
I missed were he said he played at 1024x768, I assumed he would be playing at 720p based off of his display. The GTS 250 would be good taking that into account.