UA_Iron Daemon Poster Messages 857 Jul 18, 2006 #11 yeah I agree, from what I have read, decent mobo's seem to be the limiting factor in cost and overclockability at this point. oh, and the fact the chips arent available to the public yet!
yeah I agree, from what I have read, decent mobo's seem to be the limiting factor in cost and overclockability at this point. oh, and the fact the chips arent available to the public yet!
Spartan Daemon Poster Messages 814 Jul 18, 2006 #12 Any of the Conroes, even the X6300 is performing VERY well in preliminary tests done over at XS Forums. I think that the X6300 was beating the FX-62 on most of the tests.
Any of the Conroes, even the X6300 is performing VERY well in preliminary tests done over at XS Forums. I think that the X6300 was beating the FX-62 on most of the tests.
BiGyLiLuPdAmIdL Vinsanity Messages 1,234 Location West Coast Cali Jul 18, 2006 #13 So you're saying even the lowest Intel Conroe will be better than the best AMD (for example, FX-60)? Is that what you guys are getting at?
So you're saying even the lowest Intel Conroe will be better than the best AMD (for example, FX-60)? Is that what you guys are getting at?
A arctic388 In Runtime Messages 160 Jul 18, 2006 #14 http://www.xbitlabs.com/articles/cpu/display/core2duo-e6300.html