Raid? - Page 2 - Techist - Tech Forum

Go Back   Techist - Tech Forum > Computer Hardware > System Upgrades
Click Here to Login
Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
 
Old 03-15-2006, 03:56 PM   #11 (permalink)
Member (again)
 
macdude425's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Raul's Wild Kingdom...How 'bout that, huh?
Posts: 4,202
Send a message via AIM to macdude425 Send a message via Yahoo to macdude425
Default

Why do you say that?
__________________

__________________



Debian Support Forums!
macdude425 is offline  
Old 03-15-2006, 03:57 PM   #12 (permalink)
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 38
Default

slower transfer rate than SATA. this is all.
__________________

midi_junkie is offline  
Old 03-15-2006, 04:49 PM   #13 (permalink)
Ste
Do not Stare at my Avatar
 
Ste's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Upon Gleaning Infinity
Posts: 9,577
Send a message via MSN to Ste
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by midi_junkie
slower transfer rate than SATA. this is all.
You have no idea what you talking about..

Now lets think about this Logically, RAID1 "May" be slightly slower, only because it makes a copy of the File onto another HD but, RAID 0 and 5 Are definitly Not slower.

Spliting the data In half (RAID 0) and Splitting the Data into Thirds (RAID 5), Makes transfer, Read and write Alot faster because its doing it in smaller Pieces. If you say a single 7,200 RPM SATA Drive IS faster then then two 7,200 RPM SATA Drives in RAID 0, then your just Wrong.

If your talking about PATA RAID, then Yes it is Slower then SATA RAID, only because its an older Technology...
Ste is offline  
Old 03-15-2006, 06:27 PM   #14 (permalink)
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 38
Default

i ahev no idea what im talking about and then you prove me right by saying raid is slower than sata? tf are going on about then?
midi_junkie is offline  
Old 03-15-2006, 06:28 PM   #15 (permalink)
Member (again)
 
macdude425's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Raul's Wild Kingdom...How 'bout that, huh?
Posts: 4,202
Send a message via AIM to macdude425 Send a message via Yahoo to macdude425
Default

Quote:
If you say a single 7,200 RPM SATA Drive IS faster then then two 7,200 RPM SATA Drives in RAID 0, then your just Wrong.
Not what he said, midi.
__________________



Debian Support Forums!
macdude425 is offline  
Old 03-15-2006, 06:34 PM   #16 (permalink)
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 38
Default

"You have no idea what you talking about.." no thats what he said.. i never said anything about dual drives dude wtf?
midi_junkie is offline  
Old 03-15-2006, 06:36 PM   #17 (permalink)
Member (again)
 
macdude425's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Raul's Wild Kingdom...How 'bout that, huh?
Posts: 4,202
Send a message via AIM to macdude425 Send a message via Yahoo to macdude425
Default

Dual drives are the basis of RAID. He was just proving a point.
__________________



Debian Support Forums!
macdude425 is offline  
Old 03-15-2006, 07:12 PM   #18 (permalink)
Ste
Do not Stare at my Avatar
 
Ste's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Upon Gleaning Infinity
Posts: 9,577
Send a message via MSN to Ste
Default

Yes, You said

"RAID Sucks"

You said

"Slow Transfer rates then SATA"

You can say RAID Sucks, great sure, thats your opinion, but when you Say "it has slower transfer rates then SATA" there your wrong and I told you that.

You didn't Specifally have to say anything about "Dual Drives" however when you comment on RAID, you should know that any RAID uses more then 1 Drive therefore., you did say something about More then 1 drive, because the only time RAID can be implemented is with 2 or more Drives.

And I have no idea how you got that its Slower, because its actualy not. Prehaps you should do some reasearch before Spouting off on technologies you know very little to nothing about.....

And prehaps you should learn how to read, Because I clearly said the SATA RAID is Faster then a single SATA Drive.... Prehaps not in that direct form, but if you Had Smarts of any kind you could have figured it out...

End.
Ste is offline  
Old 03-15-2006, 07:26 PM   #19 (permalink)
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 38
Default

you can have two sata.. **** you can have 300! wtf are you talking about im saying raid is slower than sata which it is! point proven.

"end."
midi_junkie is offline  
Old 03-15-2006, 07:39 PM   #20 (permalink)
Member (again)
 
macdude425's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Raul's Wild Kingdom...How 'bout that, huh?
Posts: 4,202
Send a message via AIM to macdude425 Send a message via Yahoo to macdude425
Default

Point proven for Ste. Sorry you won't be able to rebutt, because I'm locking this thread to keep it from turning into a flame war (it's already halfway there).
__________________

__________________



Debian Support Forums!
macdude425 is offline  
Closed Thread

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off




Copyright 2002- Social Knowledge, LLC All Rights Reserved.

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:04 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.