l2 cache vs. operating frequency - Techist - Tech Forum

Go Back   Techist - Tech Forum > Computer Hardware > System Upgrades
Click Here to Login
Closed Thread
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 04-28-2006, 06:53 PM   #1 (permalink)
True Techie
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 189
Default l2 cache vs. operating frequency

Im trying to decide between the AMD opteron 165 and the athlon x2 4200. The only differences that i can see are the different cores (denmark vs. manchester) and the opteron had a larger l2 cache while the opteron has a higher operating frequency (2*512 vs. 2*1mb and 1.8 ghz vs. 2.2ghz)

keeping in mind that i probably will not be overclocking, what would be the advantages for each side of a larger l2 cache vs. a higher operating frequency? Which core is better...?

triskit is offline  
Old 04-28-2006, 08:45 PM   #2 (permalink)
Super Techie
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 456
Send a message via AIM to meefle

first of all, if ur gettin an X2, dont get the 4200+, get the 3800+ and OC the .2GHz, u could easily do it (i kno u wont be OCin but still, thats very easy and it'll save u a few bucks to put into something else). The opty is the OCer, so you would probably want the X2 3800+ . If u want 1MB of cache in a X2, get the 4400+ but thats pretty expensive.

*Opteron 165 1.8Ghz
*DFI Lanparty UT nF4 Ultra-D
*HIS Hightech X1900XT 512MB w/ Zalman VF900 (Core: 690Mhz, Mem: 1500Mhz)
*G.Skill 1GB DDR 400
*Kingwin Mutant X Series
*HP IDE Lightscribe DVD Burner
*Seagate Barracuda 80GB SATA II
*Maxtor 80GB IDE
*OCZ Gamexstream 600W PSU
meefle is offline  
Old 04-28-2006, 11:13 PM   #3 (permalink)
Super Techie
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 337
Send a message via AIM to shdwsclan

Addressable cache is great and it will increase memory read and write significantly.

Frequency has nothing to do with processor speed directly, and processor speed is not measured in frequency but many noobs think so...
Its usually measurind in CPI which is cycles per instruction.....
You want to look at benchmarks or the procs....not the freqency.....**** i could get a itanium 2 at only 1.2ghz and still have a faster processor than a cluster of dual cored opterons put together....

BASELINE, you want to look at the benchmarks....
shdwsclan is offline  
Old 04-29-2006, 03:50 AM   #4 (permalink)
Lord Techie
Nitestick's Avatar
Join Date: May 2005
Location: смерти для спаме
Posts: 8,473

the 4200+ will outperform the opteron 165 at stock speeds. if you change your mind about overclocking though its a whole different ball game.........
Nitestick is offline  
Old 04-29-2006, 08:26 AM   #5 (permalink)
Wizard Techie
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Delaware
Posts: 3,475

Cache is super fast memory that can speed up the CPU if you have higher latency RAM.
turtile is offline  
Old 04-29-2006, 09:15 AM   #6 (permalink)
True Techie
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 189

so from what im hearing:
4200 is the better option if i dont overclock
opteron 165 is the better option if i do

where could i find the "benchmarks" for these processors?

triskit is offline  
Closed Thread

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off

Copyright 2002- Social Knowledge, LLC All Rights Reserved.

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:57 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2018, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.