Great single core> Average dual core? - Page 2 - Techist - Tech Forum

Go Back   Techist - Tech Forum > Computer Hardware > System Upgrades
Click Here to Login
Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
 
Old 11-26-2007, 07:00 PM   #11 (permalink)
Future ex-member
 
lancec2c30's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Chehalis, WA
Posts: 4,012
Send a message via MSN to lancec2c30
Default Re: Great single core> Average dual core?

Right now games bench a tiny bit better on dual cores when compared to quad cores.

A 4ghz single core would stomp a 2ghz dual core. I think of it as a dual core organizing and managing data processing better then a single core. Same goes for the dual/ quad core comparison.
__________________

__________________

XP Pro | Vista Home Premium | Linux Ubuntu 7.10
s939 X2 3800 Toledo @ 2.6ghz | evga 7900gs | 320gig + 80gig wd | 1gb Ram | Abit KN8 SLI
3.1ghz achieved. :cool:
70K F@H member..............still waiting for the "iRACK"

Norcent will not be forgotten.

lancec2c30 is offline  
Old 11-26-2007, 09:56 PM   #12 (permalink)
Idealist Gamer
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 419
Default Re: Great single core> Average dual core?

Quote:
Originally Posted by lancec2c30 View Post
Right now games bench a tiny bit better on dual cores when compared to quad cores.

A 4ghz single core would stomp a 2ghz dual core. I think of it as a dual core organizing and managing data processing better then a single core. Same goes for the dual/ quad core comparison.
x_x See clearly I don't know enough about that kind of thing. Still wouldn't a 2.4ghz core beat out a 4ghz single core? I mean there are probably some inefficiencies that would degrade the power of a dual core. Even worse with a quad core. So is it like 150% better or something? Oh well it doesn't matter all that much.
__________________

Dakaggo is offline  
Old 11-26-2007, 10:12 PM   #13 (permalink)
Corrupt Techie
 
aetherh4cker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 752
Default Re: Great single core> Average dual core?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dakaggo View Post
x_x See clearly I don't know enough about that kind of thing. Still wouldn't a 2.4ghz core beat out a 4ghz single core? I mean there are probably some inefficiencies that would degrade the power of a dual core. Even worse with a quad core. So is it like 150% better or something? Oh well it doesn't matter all that much.
Let's say you have a 2.5 GHz Dual Core, and a 4 GHz Single Core.

Most applications can only be processed on a single core. So if you have Microsoft Word using 1 GHz, you can't split .5 GHz on one core, and .5 GHz on another core.

So let's say you have Microsoft Word using 3 GHz. Since it can only be on one core, it wouldn't run on the 2.5 GHz Dual Core at all.

However, let's say you have several *seperate* Microsoft Word instances up, each using .5 GHz. The 2.5 GHz Dual Core would be able to run 10 of them, puting 5 on each core, where as the 4 GHz Single Core would only be able to run 8.

So 4 GHz Single Core would be better than a 2.5 GHz Dual Core in the aspect that if anything needed more than 2.5 GHz, the Dual Core couldn't give it that. However, since the Dual Core can put *seperate* applications on one core, and some on the other core, it is obviously better for multi-tasking.

Though, this is a little different now days. I can only think of two types of applications that could max out a core: Games and Video Encoders. Games now days are being programmed to run in multiple threads, meaning one thread could be processing AI for enemies on one core, and another thread could be processing everything else on your second core.

Video encoders have supported such multi-threading for a while now.

I tend to think multiple cores are always better, since anything that could max out a core would likely support multi-threading and be able to be divided amoung all your cores.
aetherh4cker is offline  
Old 11-26-2007, 10:18 PM   #14 (permalink)
Ultra Techie
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 506
Default Re: Great single core> Average dual core?

your question should actually be Great Dual Core> Average Quad Core? And looking at the market now a year from now that question will probably have doubled, on Intel's side at least.
__________________
Alienware Full Tower Aurora Case
ABIT AV8 1.5 SOCKET 939 K8 MB
Amd X2 4800 socket 939
CORSAIR XMS 2GB (2 x 1GB) 184-Pin DDR SDRAM DDR 400 (PC 3200)
2x 500gb Seagate Barracuda 7200 RPM 16MB Cache SATA 3.0Gb/s (running at 1.5 Gb/s)
Radeon® X1950PRO AGP Xtreme Gamer Edition AGP x8
Logitech Z-5500 Digital
Creative SOUND BLASTER X-Fi Fatal1ty FPS 7.1 Channels
VIGOR GAMING CLT-M2A 92mm Thermal Electric CPU Cooler
SeaSonic M12 SS-700HM ATX12V (700 watts)
Logitech G15
LG Flatron Wide 24in
Razer Copperhead Green (First Edition)
AHS 615 Gaming Headset
Windows Vitsa Ultamite (running at 32-bit)
wolfeyes89 is offline  
Old 11-27-2007, 05:24 AM   #15 (permalink)
True Techie
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 142
Default Re: Great single core> Average dual core?

Interesting.
But I guess a dual-core is almost always a better option. I mean, there are so few "only average" dual-core processors, I think you'd have to TRY to get a better single-core. Thanks.
jeller is offline  
Old 11-27-2007, 01:10 PM   #16 (permalink)
I feel funny...
 
thirdshiftdj's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Lowell,Ma
Posts: 3,808
Send a message via AIM to thirdshiftdj
Default Re: Great single core> Average dual core?

The only good single cores in my opinion are the fX55 or 57. Its quite the beast.
__________________
NUFFIN!
thirdshiftdj is offline  
Old 11-28-2007, 01:13 AM   #17 (permalink)
Vinsanity
 
BiGyLiLuPdAmIdL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: West Coast Cali
Posts: 1,234
Send a message via AIM to BiGyLiLuPdAmIdL
Default Re: Great single core> Average dual core?

Quote:
Originally Posted by thirdshiftdj View Post
The only good single cores in my opinion are the fX55 or 57. Its quite the beast.
true, but those are overpriced compared to a dual cores, so basically single cores are obsolete right now.
__________________
New build in progress, but this is what I got for now:
-AMD x2 5200+
-Asus M3A78-EM AM2+
-Buffalo 2x1gb ddr2 800
-Hitachi 250gb Sata HDD
-Antec Minuet Case w/ 350w psu
-Windows 7 Home Premium 64 bit
BiGyLiLuPdAmIdL is offline  
Old 11-28-2007, 01:18 AM   #18 (permalink)
Future ex-member
 
lancec2c30's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Chehalis, WA
Posts: 4,012
Send a message via MSN to lancec2c30
Default Re: Great single core> Average dual core?

ya you can get a entry level AMD dual core for like $65 i think
__________________

__________________

XP Pro | Vista Home Premium | Linux Ubuntu 7.10
s939 X2 3800 Toledo @ 2.6ghz | evga 7900gs | 320gig + 80gig wd | 1gb Ram | Abit KN8 SLI
3.1ghz achieved. :cool:
70K F@H member..............still waiting for the "iRACK"

Norcent will not be forgotten.

lancec2c30 is offline  
Closed Thread

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Dual core utilization freedonutss New Systems | Building and Buying 0 11-15-2007 11:18 PM
AMD Triple Core? Osiris Monitors, Printers and Peripherals 4 09-19-2007 07:36 PM
single to dual core Nick New Systems | Building and Buying 12 07-03-2007 10:45 AM
AMD Athlon™ 64 X2 Dual Core Processor Utilities & Updates Osiris Overclocking and Modding 6 05-31-2007 01:41 PM
Core 2 Duo (Dual Core Settings) Nechen New Systems | Building and Buying 0 04-06-2007 11:57 AM



Copyright 2002- Social Knowledge, LLC All Rights Reserved.

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:15 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.