H harnar123 Daemon Poster Messages 539 Oct 1, 2008 #1 isn't the e5200 just less cache? Well I don't really know, that is why I am asking.
zedman3d Fully Optimized Messages 2,850 Oct 1, 2008 #2 Pretty much yeah, its got less cache and a lower FSB (Front Side Bus)...
S strjms72 Solid State Member Messages 18 Oct 2, 2008 #4 My vote is for the E7200. More cache'. But I do agree, wait for these bad cores to go away and then pick one up.
My vote is for the E7200. More cache'. But I do agree, wait for these bad cores to go away and then pick one up.
zedman3d Fully Optimized Messages 2,850 Oct 2, 2008 #5 strjms72 said: My vote is for the E7200. More cache'. But I do agree, wait for these bad cores to go away and then pick one up. Click to expand... Pretty sure he just wanted to know of the difference, that's all.
strjms72 said: My vote is for the E7200. More cache'. But I do agree, wait for these bad cores to go away and then pick one up. Click to expand... Pretty sure he just wanted to know of the difference, that's all.
