Check out this article (MUST READ!!!)

[wedge_00]

Has the world ended as we know, has Intel got a chip that they have ignored..... that can bet a Athlon FX
Read this articlehttp://www.tomshardware.com/cpu/20050525/index.html

Make sure you read the entire article and get a look at the Benchmarks here athttp://www.tomshardware.com/cpu/20050525/pentium4-10.html

AMD had it right from the start, more pipelines and gigahertz don't mean jack!!!! Even the Intel CEO said that NEtBUrst is finally bust!!! Hahahaha

 

[wedge_00]

Even the consumption and heat rates are about 1 third less than AMD, ecckkkk.!!!!

Is this the new look Pentium 5 or what a million dollars bets that the new chips will be based on the architecture of the M chipset

 

[wedge_00]

is anyone going to speak their mind about this article? At all? Come on where is everyone, DAMNIT!

 

[quixotic115]

well I don't know much but it seems that this is kind of interesting. So wait...this Pentium M isn't the same as Pentium D right? So what's going to happen to this chip?

 

[vaderpro]

alli can say is wow. holy crapola.

 

[damasta55r]

Read the article long time ago. Conroe, i hope will bring intel back in the game. .

Roger

 

[Apokalipse]

maybe Intel will actually try to make their CPU's better now.

 

[Chankama]

AMD had it right from the start, more pipelines and gigahertz don't mean jack!!!!

Sure they do. Just that Intel ignored other factors that were important.

I'd like more pipelines in my processors.. Assuming there are sufficient resources to implement a pipeline - and you do it smartly. If you meant "longer pipelines" well, that's a different debate. We need to discuss which applications we are going to be using.

 

[Trotter]

From what I read elsewhere, the next gen of Intel chips will be falling back on the tech of the P3s.

 

[Chankama]

Yup they will. . What a waste eh?. They screwed up P4 royally...