The best value non-gaming processor today (FLOPS/dollar) - Techist - Tech Forum

Go Back   Techist - Tech Forum > Computer Hardware > System Upgrades
Click Here to Login
Closed Thread
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 04-28-2009, 02:52 PM   #1 (permalink)
Newb Techie
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 28
Default The best value non-gaming processor today (FLOPS/dollar)

I am trying to build the fastest possible non-gaming desktop computer for my mom for around $400, and I was curious as to what processor I should base it around.

This is a strictly non-gaming computer and so I've been looking at cheap server processors like the Phenom X4 which is according to CNET only marginally slower than Intel's Wolfdale quad core processors, but is advertised on as less than 1/2 the price and is even cheaper than the core2duo.

The computer doesn't have to be fast it just has to be efficient. No encoding, no graphics, no media.

I'm really just interested in which processor will give the most general computing performance per dollar spend on the chip.

Akoto is offline  
Old 04-28-2009, 03:13 PM   #2 (permalink)
rustle rustle
35g700's Avatar
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Maine
Posts: 1,581
Default Re: The best value non-gaming processor today (FLOPS/dollar)

The original Phenom X4's where not very good at all. There where issue's with some that wouldn't let you install x64 versions of windows and the fix they made slowed down the CPU and on top of that you could get Intel which is much faster clock per clock.

If you are looking for a good CPU that is cheap I would recommend either an Athlon X2 7750 for AMD or an E5200 from Intel. They are both around the same price, the Intel one will be faster but if you go for onboard video card (Which I'm assuming you will because of the low price) the boards for the AMD CPU will have better onboard video card but if she is not doing gaming she probably won't notice a difference between the onboard video cards.

Core i7 8700K @ 4.8GHz - Asus Z370-E - Gigabyte GTX 970 - 16GB DDR4 3000MHz - 500GB Samsung 960 EVO - Windows 10 Pro x64
Mid 2014 Retina MacBook Pro 13.3" - 2.6GHz core i5 - 16GB DDR3 1600MHz - 128GB - macOS High Sierra
Sony PS3 & PS4 500GB || iPhone 6s 64GB iOS 11 || Sony a6000
35g700 is offline  
Old 04-28-2009, 03:53 PM   #3 (permalink)
Newb Techie
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 28
Default Re: The best value non-gaming processor today (FLOPS/dollar)

She will be running windows xp-32 and I'll make sure she understands not to upgrade. I guess my only fear then is support for windows 7 and how compatible it will be after 2 or so years time without possibly upgrading to a later version of windows. Thoughts?

Horrible graphics support is perfectly OK provided the processor is fast enough to software render things like 2D-images and large/fairly complex maps (she does work in land conservation and so deals with a large range of still 2d-imagery. Possibly some very large images or layered maps), as well as any graphical web-apps she might run into. In fact, having almost no graphics support at all will discourage siblings from using moms new quad core computer for gaming.

If it's between a faster dual core (higher processing power/core) and a slower true quad core (both of comparable overall performance/price), which of the two will have better support or capabilities in the future? I know it's the case especially with older games where they're only really able to exploit one core, and therefore often benchmark higher on older processors with fewer cores but with higher clock speeds.

Since I'm interested in longevity as well, my assumption is that a true quad core processor bought today would outlast even a slightly better dual core chip in terms of application support/ability to effectively exploit multiple cores several years down the road. Thoughts?
Akoto is offline  
Closed Thread

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Gaming Pc $3000 limit! Plz Help! Guttzu New Systems | Building and Buying 114 04-29-2009 05:18 PM
Is dual better than quad, for non-PC gaming? Johnathan New Systems | Building and Buying 8 10-27-2008 12:48 PM
New Gaming System. Help? BoxcarRichard New Systems | Building and Buying 9 04-26-2008 05:15 AM
Green Peace Thinks Gaming is bad for the environment Harper Off Topic Discussion 15 03-14-2008 07:00 AM
Help me choose Gaming PC fameb New Systems | Building and Buying 51 03-11-2008 03:47 PM

Copyright 2002- Social Knowledge, LLC All Rights Reserved.

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:08 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2018, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.