Apokalipse
Golden Master
- Messages
- 14,559
- Location
- Melbourne, Australia
The thing is, they're not always.I don't like AMD but I always show how AMD is worse than Intel based on benchmarks, and reviews.
I mean K8 processors were definitely ahead of Netburst chips, and so were Athlon's and Athlon XP's XP's against Pentium 3's then early netburst chips.
Core 2's are faster per clock than K8 processors, but Phenom has really closed the gap, and sometimes it is faster (which happens more when they're clocked over 3GHZ, especially in games)
Even if Core 2's overall do bench faster, one can't say that the Phenom processors are slow.
It's kinda like saying the Renault F1 cars are slow when Ferrari's are winning, or something.
Even the slowest F1 cars are far from slow. They'd beat the crap out of the 1300cc Mazda Metro I drive (sometimes called Demio in other countries)
Anyway, I don't understand why you don't like AMD, maroon1. They're not a bad company, and they do have a history of making competitive processors, even if they aren't always in the lead.
The reason I don't like Intel, is not because of their processors. It's because of their business ethics.