64-bit P4

[Elbatrop1]

I was browsing through intel's website, and found this. What do you guys think?

http://www.intel.com/products/serve...entium4/index.htm?iid=ipp_srvr+proc_p4_em64t&

 

[Brisky]

Uh your linky doesn't seem to be working right.

But I am sure Intel is just upset that AMD beat them to the 64 bit era and now are trying to play ketchup.

 

[IceyDeath23]

HAHA intel always so slow...

 

[Elbatrop1]

Uh your linky doesn't seem to be working right.

But I am sure Intel is just upset that AMD beat them to the 64 bit era and now are trying to play ketchup.

Hmmm. It worked fine just now.

 

[_SiLv3R_]

thats intel's pathetic excuse for a processor with a 64-but architecture.. it doesnt have a TRUE 64 bit archetecture.. it just tricks itself and every other piece of ur hardware into thinking that it can perform at the 64-but levell.. which it can do.. but its nowhere NEAR the 64 or 64-FX seriies.. ive been hearing talks of a 4ghz p4 with true 64-but architecture coming out but im not when it will actually come out

 

[drprince89]

^^ that will probably be incredibly expensive too.

 

[OIDanTheManIO]

But I thought that the AMD Athlon 64 Bit was the only Windows-compatible CPU. Under the requirements for this P$ 64 bit, it says it just requires an OS.

Am I wrong?

-Dan The Man

 

[_SiLv3R_]

right now amd 64 bit series are the only TRUE 64-but processors out their that support windows.. that intel chip isnt based on a true 64 bit architecture like i said

 

[bcass]

um......its still a 64-bit proc. AMD might have beat intel but intel isn't that far behind.

 

[Brisky]

Didn't Microsoft say that they wouldn't allow any other 64bit CPU on windows but AMD's architecture?

Oh and the link is working for me now.