OP
OP
BennyV04988
Fully Optimized
- Messages
- 1,835
Let's not forget, if it was a demolition, it wouldn't be MADE to look exactly like a demolition, it would be timed to look as if it was falling to pieces naturally.
The WTC design should have easily withstood the impact of the explosion as well, considering these buildings are made for hurricane winds, and designed with sigma values approaching 3.
I think the biggest clue is building 7. I think they expected B7 to be more damaged than it was, and yet they couldn't leave the building rigged with thermate so they just dropped it.
Another big clue is the angle CUTS of the beams. If the building came down due to stress fractures and such, the steel would have been warped and bent from torsion and sheared and buckled, not pristinely cut as if snapping like glass all the way at the base of the building.
What they call "explosions" though could be simple compression of the concrete floors smashing windows.
I'm not sure if a plane with jet fuel that burned in air, (not the building) really could bring down a building of that size... i mean... it could go both ways. I never looked and said "no way... must be demo". But the clues all point the presence OF a demo. Basically, moooost the "this couldn't have happened with a demo" does nothing for me. Its only the evidence that screams demo that does.
The WTC design should have easily withstood the impact of the explosion as well, considering these buildings are made for hurricane winds, and designed with sigma values approaching 3.
I think the biggest clue is building 7. I think they expected B7 to be more damaged than it was, and yet they couldn't leave the building rigged with thermate so they just dropped it.
Another big clue is the angle CUTS of the beams. If the building came down due to stress fractures and such, the steel would have been warped and bent from torsion and sheared and buckled, not pristinely cut as if snapping like glass all the way at the base of the building.
What they call "explosions" though could be simple compression of the concrete floors smashing windows.
I'm not sure if a plane with jet fuel that burned in air, (not the building) really could bring down a building of that size... i mean... it could go both ways. I never looked and said "no way... must be demo". But the clues all point the presence OF a demo. Basically, moooost the "this couldn't have happened with a demo" does nothing for me. Its only the evidence that screams demo that does.
