^ < V Game

[b0dge]

^ Has bad grammar in their sig
< Is drunk
V Can't drink as much as me...

 

[Luke]

^ i can tell your drunk, as there is no bad grammar in my signature
< annoyed
V wondering what the guy in b0dge's avatar is doing

 

[toxicity_27]

^ sounds like a challenge to me
< can definitely drink quite a bit
v wants to see b0dge and me drink

 

[b0dge]

^ Definitely should come to the pub on a schoolnight
< Can see clearly that Luke has bad grammar in his sig
V Can't drink as much as toxicity_27

 

[Luke]

^I probably can't
< if you are referring to the missing Have's and it being gave because of the missing have's then that is not bad grammar, i did that for it was shorter. There is nothing else that you could be refering to as bad grammar, so i hope that is what you mean lol.
V will still play pac man...on the Atari.

 

[toxicity_27]

^ I think he's talking about the "seen" it should be saw...
< Is wondering how much b0dge can drink...
v will tell me

 

[b0dge]

^ Is correct, although "saw" wouldn't make it any better
< Is drunk
V Isn't drunk

 

[Luke]

^correct
< actually my sig should say "seen" seen is referring to current, "saw" is in the past, so i want it to mean current, so no bad grammar, it is correct. Also both have synonyms of "see" so both can be considered correct it does not mater if i meant it to be previously or currently.
V is drunk

 

[b0dge]

^ is trying to claim that "Or You Seen That I Gave Good Advice" is good grammar
< laughs
V realises what I've been talking about

 

[toxicity_27]

^ yes, he starts it out past tense, tries to go present tense in the middle and ends in past tense
< laughs with b0dge
v will realize what we see