ATIRAGEPRO
Daemon Poster
- Messages
- 1,400
"outlook Exposure..."
1. Common thiefÂ’s (Those that steel what they need,)
2. Common criminals. (People who steal cuz they want to.)
You may not get this, but there is a BIG difference between morals and wisdom.
A moral is wisdom that you learn from someone else, and wisdom is something that you learn for yourself. And I am one to know that MONEY is no objectÂ…
So the way YOU see it, is that itÂ’s NOT right for people to steal something that they need. For instance, if someone STEALS money in order to feed his family, then heÂ’s nothing more than a common criminal. So if I steal programs like Macromedia Studio MX 2004 to make websites for companies to pay my BILLS, than IÂ’m nothing more than a thief and a liar. Right? In that case, there are two types of software criminals out their;DMo224 said:So, since situation ethics says that stealing is only bad in some cases and that stealing is okay in some cases, what is the criteria to determine if it's okay or not? Is it that when a company has millions it's okay to steal from them? Or is it when in your estimation its software is overpriced, then it's okay to steal it?
And if stealing something that is "easy" to steal is okay, what about someone that can steal my car in about 30 seconds and it's overpriced anyway, is that okay?
No one likes paying for anything! I agree! I would rather save all my money for what I want to buy. But if I can justify stealing it, why do I need money to begin with.
People can justify anything....at least in their own minds!
[/rant]
Dave
1. Common thiefÂ’s (Those that steel what they need,)
2. Common criminals. (People who steal cuz they want to.)
You may not get this, but there is a BIG difference between morals and wisdom.
A moral is wisdom that you learn from someone else, and wisdom is something that you learn for yourself. And I am one to know that MONEY is no objectÂ…