OP OP T talldude123 Banned Messages 7,915 Feb 1, 2006 #11 why does MS think that you can run XP on a 128 MB machine, and 64 MB without features? only litexp can do that...
why does MS think that you can run XP on a 128 MB machine, and 64 MB without features? only litexp can do that...
D DJ-CHRIS Golden Master Messages 8,010 Feb 1, 2006 #12 talldude123 said: why does MS think that you can run XP on a 128 MB machine, and 64 MB without features? only litexp can do that... Click to expand... Cuz you can run XP on 128 ***AMD GAMING MACHINNE*** 2x 512 meg sticks 300 meg used in average situation, 200 used if I am not running FF, WMP and GAIM. ***Oldskool Hyperterminal Laptop*** 2x 64 meg sticks 120 meg used running nothing but AV and Hyperterminal, and maybee SSH
talldude123 said: why does MS think that you can run XP on a 128 MB machine, and 64 MB without features? only litexp can do that... Click to expand... Cuz you can run XP on 128 ***AMD GAMING MACHINNE*** 2x 512 meg sticks 300 meg used in average situation, 200 used if I am not running FF, WMP and GAIM. ***Oldskool Hyperterminal Laptop*** 2x 64 meg sticks 120 meg used running nothing but AV and Hyperterminal, and maybee SSH
OP OP T talldude123 Banned Messages 7,915 Feb 1, 2006 #13 does windows automatically adjust to the amount of memory you currently have in your PC?
