Pulitzer prize winning picture

[Mr. Switch]

Well, the picture obviously serves its purpose. It shocks whoever sees it and slaps them with the grim reality of life in poor countries.

He didn't have to touch the baby, but he could've atleast thrown her a water bottle and some nutrition bar.. I bet he didn't do that either. Instead, he just took a picture and left

I don't mean to sound evil or somethig, but the child could of been to weak to eat. not only that, but the photographer could of killed the kid for giving her food. the sudden burst of nutrition and depending on what the food was, she could of died by that from her weak stomach musles or something.

its like when vegitarians eat meat. They get very sick, almost like food poisoning, and alot of the people in poor countries like Sudan and Somalia are mostly vegitarian because thats all they can get a hold of, if the photographer had given the girl anythign with some form of meat in it, than he could of made the situation worse.

It is very unfortunate that people suffer from hunger, and its very unfortunate that the photographer commited suicide because of it.

 

[DJ-CHRIS]

a photographer/journalist obviously.

All you people who are all "HE SHOULDA HELPED" dont realize, that that child would have died regardless what he would have done....get with the program and realize that's real life...not everything is sugar coated peachy happiness like some of you seem to believe. Not everything can be helped and every situation fixed to get a happy ending.

Yeah it's sad, but theres just shit in life that you have absolutely no control over.




Welcome to the real world.

Well said that child would have died by eating food. If you are dyeing and starving you cannot simply eat food again.