PP Mguire
Build Guru
- Messages
- 32,592
- Location
- Fort Worth, Texas
Probably why they're so successful.SpaceX is very liberal with spending in IT. I've probably spent 1-2 million dollars in the last year.
I'd be willing to bet that's exactly what they're doing. Lockheed on the other hand when a power user gets something it's typically quite underpowered because the ITRAs have absolutely no idea wtf they're doing.On what ?
I'm obviously a huge PC fan and tech guy, but if I were running a company, I wouldn't take the piss. I'm not giving some office admin person who works out of Excel and Outlook thousands of dollars worth of screens and a top end PC. You get a couple of 24" TN panel monitor, and a standard spec desktop PC. At the same time if you're obviously a power user who is genuinely going to work faster and more productively with three 4K monitors, then I wouldn't have a problem with that either.
Honestly the sweet spot is between 120 and 200. More around 165ish. I'd say 4k per eye would be easy enough in the next gen of cards or two.In current tech they're sacrificing FPS for resolution, or vice versa. So to have 8k or 2x4k sounds all nice but that would prob be 30fps... intolerable for VR, would make me nauseous
In a perfect world I would love to see 500 fps at 8k each eye (2x8k)... now thats some tech I can get behind