Re: Today I have...
I think you're getting confused between the media reporting of the links, and what the scientists are actually saying. The vast majority of these links between substance X and cancer are simply the scientists doing a study, such as:
1,000 people tested
500 use substance X
500 don't
(severely simplified)
And there happens to be a larger percentage of people using the substance who go on to develop cancer. Now, it's not the scientists saying that 'substance X causes cancer'; that's the media dumbing it down, or as they frequently do, just reporting it wrong/not doing research.
The scientists are only saying is that 'people who use substance X might be more likely to develop cancer than those who don't, based on this particular study.'
Now there are annoying cases where there's a bias (i.e. they're paid or it's just bad science), but the vast majority of the 'Everything causes cancer!' is due to the media. You might've noticed it all the time as well with 'cures' for cancer - every time there's a tiny step forward in cancer research it gets headlined as 'Cure for cancer closer than ever!'.
They are all wrong. With so little Drs know about cancer it is impossible for all their claims to be right besides the ones they have a huge test field in like smoking. You have to be public sheep to think that everything they claim causes cancer. I mean, just look at the cell phone and brain cancer crap. It's total BS. It is my personal opinion that if they knew so much to make plausible claims on the matter then they would know how to fix the **** without such a huge death rate. So therefor, I think they are just spitting out claims because it isn't like anybody else can prove them wrong. If and when they do (if), they are just like oh GG like they did with the cell phones.
I think you're getting confused between the media reporting of the links, and what the scientists are actually saying. The vast majority of these links between substance X and cancer are simply the scientists doing a study, such as:
1,000 people tested
500 use substance X
500 don't
(severely simplified)
And there happens to be a larger percentage of people using the substance who go on to develop cancer. Now, it's not the scientists saying that 'substance X causes cancer'; that's the media dumbing it down, or as they frequently do, just reporting it wrong/not doing research.
The scientists are only saying is that 'people who use substance X might be more likely to develop cancer than those who don't, based on this particular study.'
Now there are annoying cases where there's a bias (i.e. they're paid or it's just bad science), but the vast majority of the 'Everything causes cancer!' is due to the media. You might've noticed it all the time as well with 'cures' for cancer - every time there's a tiny step forward in cancer research it gets headlined as 'Cure for cancer closer than ever!'.