Am I the only one who had to read that jumble of words a few times just to understand what he was trying to say?
Even though its a bunch of rubbish, he's right--for the most part. Canon is superior for digital SLR's (5D and 1Ds have full frame 35mm sensors), better color reproduction, and Nikon is superior for film SLR's (rugged and fast). I had a freind who had an F4 and you could drop, kick, and play basketball with it, and it would still work like new.
kodak are rubbish i wud say Nikon are the best canon are ok but there software stink
If you're going to buy a point and shoot'er don't get a Kodak product. I have never had a good experince with Kodak camera's (film). Their digital products
might be different, but i bet their still made with shoddy materials.
If your going to spend almost $300 on a camera, Get a Canon PowerShot A610.
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.asp?Item=N82E16830120180
I was given this camera for a christmas present, but had to return it because I needed an SLR. For an el cheapo point-and-shoot'er, this think is pretty nice. Its got many many more manual (as far as point and shooters are concerned) controls, the zoom reahes out further, is easier to hold, and is made from one of the top camera manufacturers.
