saltynay Patron Messages 5,149 Location West Coast, Singapore Jan 19, 2009 #22 Its defo not the QX6850 as that has a 1333mhz fsb. X3210 (**** myself for making a slightly longer post)
Its defo not the QX6850 as that has a 1333mhz fsb. X3210 (**** myself for making a slightly longer post)
E Ethan_Kaizer Daemon Poster Messages 881 Location Long Island, NY, USA Jan 19, 2009 #23 saltynay said: Its defo not the QX6850 as that has a 1333mhz fsb. X3210 (**** myself for making a slightly longer post) Click to expand... I win It's the only Quad Kentsfield at 2.13 GHz stock, also 65nm.
saltynay said: Its defo not the QX6850 as that has a 1333mhz fsb. X3210 (**** myself for making a slightly longer post) Click to expand... I win It's the only Quad Kentsfield at 2.13 GHz stock, also 65nm.
philbar71 Fully Optimized Messages 4,533 Location Suffolk, VA Jan 19, 2009 #24 i think i am in agreement, xeon 3210.
Prototype Daemon Poster Messages 1,276 Location Katy, Texas Jan 19, 2009 #25 Ethan_Kaizer said: Is it an X3210? Click to expand... Correct.
philbar71 Fully Optimized Messages 4,533 Location Suffolk, VA Jan 19, 2009 #26 now ,ethan, you get to post one!
E Ethan_Kaizer Daemon Poster Messages 881 Location Long Island, NY, USA Jan 20, 2009 #27 philbar71 said: now ,ethan, you get to post one! Click to expand... I only have an E4600 at the moment, and I don't have time to search the net for CPU-Z pics right now Someone else feel free to post a new one.
philbar71 said: now ,ethan, you get to post one! Click to expand... I only have an E4600 at the moment, and I don't have time to search the net for CPU-Z pics right now Someone else feel free to post a new one.
Hefemeister Lord Techie, Messages 9,093 Location Sweden Jan 20, 2009 #29 Phenom 9600? Underclocked and running a bit too much voltage?