a.) When you have an absolute value in an inequality, you solve it out two ways:
3x+2 > 4 is one way; subtract 2 from both sides
3x > 2 - divide both sides by 3
x > 2/3
The second way you write it is by reversing the sign and negating the 4. You do this because |x| is the same value as |-x|, and you expressed |x| in the first equation, so now you're doing |-x|. But you divide by -1 to get the negative sign on the right, and when you divide by a negative number you reverse the sign of an inequality.
3x+2 < -4 (subtract 2 from both sides)
3x < -6 (divide by 3)
x < -2
b.) Ok... My first answer for this is wrong, but I think I've got the steps now:
For any fraction to be less than 0, it has to be negative, and for a fraction to be negative, either the numerator or the denominator has to be negative. So if we make the numerator negative, than x+1 < 0, which simplifies to
x < -1. So that's one condition for one solution. For the next condition for this solution, the denominator has to be positive. This means that neither of the terms can be negative, so x > -2 and x > 3. But we've got a problem because x can't be less than -1 and greater than -2 and greater than 3. So then can try making the denominator positive by multiplying two negative terms. Now, in addition to x < -1, we add the conditions x < -2 and x < 2. Since these are all "less than" conditions, we only need the one condition x < -2, which we already have. So one solution is
x < -2.
So now we do the solution where the numerator is positive and the denominator is negative. To make the numerator positive, x > -1. To make the denominator negative, one (but not both) of the two terms has to be negative. To make (x+2) a negative number, x < -2. But x < -2 is negated by x > -1, so we can't use that condition. To make (x-3) negative, x < 3. Therefore, the two conditions for the second solution are
x > -1 and x < 3.
So... um... lots of writing. Final solutions:
x < -2 and
-1 < x < 3.
P.S. I'm sure there is a much, much easier, more efficient way of doing this problem but this is just a very, er, thorough way.