Firefox May Already Be Dead

Status
Not open for further replies.

Osiris

Golden Master
Messages
36,817
Location
Kentucky
This is an exciting time for Web browsers. Dell Mini 9, it started in the blink of an eye. Additionally, any JavaScript-heavy sites like Gmail or Google Docs were so responsive that it's almost unbelievable.
Does that sound familiar? That's right. It's just like how Firefox used to be.
Run Chrome and Firefox side-by-side, and Firefox is embarrassingly slow. It's not even in the same league. It's an old man on the running track trying to compete against a sprightly 20-year-old.
I think Firefox has lost the plot. This is a British phrase, and I'm not sure it's used widely in the US, so perhaps it requires some explanation. But it's not hard to work out. It implies a blind dedication to something questionable. If a car owner becomes obsessed with tricking out his vehicle, to the extent of wiping out his kids' college fund to raise the cash, then he might be described as losing the plot. Yeah, he's admirably determined, and the car does look very cool. But he's lost all concept of what's actually important.
Mozilla have several grand aims, and there's much to be admired, but they've forgotten how to make a decent browser. I feel plenty of loyalty for them, because they've done more than anybody else to further the cause of open source software in the real world. But when I tried Chrome, as incomplete as it was, I realized I'd found a replacement for Firefox. As soon as it gets to beta under Linux, I will switch to Chrome. No question. It's just infinitely better. It's like when we all switched from Alta Vista (or Yahoo!) to Google back in the early noughties. The king is dead! Long live the king!
One thing is certain: Firefox is no longer the darling of the Internet digerati. Take a look at the comments on this Slashdot thread. There's a surprising amount of vitriol out there nowadays.
I'm just one guy, so why should Mozilla care? Why should they even care if a million people stop using their browser? After all, this is open source, and open source software is technology driven. That's why it's better than proprietary software. There's no pressing need to keep users sweet.
The problem for Mozilla is that its income comes from end-users. Every time you search using Firefox's built-in search, Mozilla gets a small cut. Multiply that by millions of searches every day and it adds up. Effectively, Google pays for Mozilla's continued existence, but without any of us using Firefox, Mozilla is up a creek without a paddle.
I fear that the Firefox project is a juggernaut that can't stop. It's got too much momentum and is determined to head in the direction it has chosen. In short, I honestly think it's too late. Despite the fact it's not really ready for human consumption, Chrome has won. Firefox is already dead. The only way the situation can be altered is for Mozilla to slam on the brakes, lean out of the window of the truck, apologize for going the wrong way, and turn around. But that's unimaginable.
You might disagree with me. But will you do me a favor? In two or three years time, when you're using Chrome (or maybe a forked project), will you come back here and admit I was right?


Yahoo! News - Firefox May Already Be Dead by PC World: Yahoo! Tech
 
I will admit you are right now; firefox has lost its sight. I thought 3.0 was gonna be a change of things, and it was for a few weeks; but with the new details on 3.1, I lost my faith in the browser. It's just too bad I think IE8 is a dud, and I'm not particularly comfortable using chrome.
 
It implies a blind dedication to something questionable

You mean like Windows?

Anyways, I haven't had any trouble with FF3, it's stable and way quicker than IE ever could be.

Of course I haven't used Chrome or even heard of the Dell thing.

Does Chrome support all the features and extensions and addons that FF3 does? It is as safe? Is it as easy to use?

When Chrome first came out I heard that it sucked, so I didn't think twice about it.
 
Does Chrome support all the features and extensions and addons that FF3 does? It is as safe? Is it as easy to use?
It's definitely as easy to use, but the problem is as you said, it doesn't have the same number of extensions and addons as FF3, which also means it's not as safe.
I personally like Chrome, and use it occasionally, but I couldn't be without all the FF extensions I have.

It's definitely worth giving it a try.
 
It's definitely as easy to use, but the problem is as you said, it doesn't have the same number of extensions and addons as FF3, which also means it's not as safe.

Yeah, versatility is key. I'll stick with something that has more tools rather than something that's just shiny.

Maybe I'll check it out, see if it's worthwhile.
 
I have IE 8 and FF3 and GC.

Firefox will always be my number 1 browser.
IE is slow......
GC, Is just like... There's like no tools.
Google Chrome = Epic Fail.
 
Google Chrome doesn't have a history button either.



EDIT:
So I can't delete my porn sites, I visit.

LMFAO, Just kidding ;)
 
chromehistory.png


Edit: Oh, you said you were kidding -_-
 
I would rather that Mozilla kept Fireefox to its lean core and let users add their own functionality via extensions instead of adding things in for them. While I use a rather large list of extensions, many don't; the "added" functions just slow these people down.

My main problem with Chrome is Google Updater. I have a real problem with any program that puts itself in my startup without permission. If I want to update it, I will update it. That goes for anything on my computer, be it Java, Windows, whatever. I want to retain control over what it going in and out. Since Google think it knows better than me it can keep its browser.

Second to that is the lack of extensions. Google is working on that, but unless it gets the grassroots involvement like Firefox it won't be able to compete.

As for the others, Safari is just sad in my eyes. Opera may be OK, but I didn't like the way it tried to take over everything when I tried it. I have IE8 as a stand-alone and as IE Tab in Firefox just because of the anal web sites that are IE only. IE 7/8 is not bad, but it doesn't stack up to my functionality in Firefox.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom