Qiranworms
Fully Optimized
- Messages
- 1,635
I hear people say this again and again, and I just can't see how it's true. You'd think that in five years of OS X, SOMEONE would have created a virus, maybe just to have the glory of 'I created the first and only Mac OS X virus'. But there hasn't been a single one thus far. Not to say that there can't be, or won't be, but Mac OS X is inherently more secure and less susceptible to malware by design than Windows. If the tables were to turn, I highly doubt we'd see nearly the epidemic of malware that Windows users suffer from today. If there was a direct correlation between popularity and number of security holes, shouldn't Apache be less secure than IIS?Nikkon said:The reason why there are not virus' for mac based systems has nothing to do with Unix. It is a waste of a programers time to write a virus for them. IF (and this is a big if) macs where ever used as widespread as Windows machines then there would be just as many virus'/vanurabilities as windows.
Mac antivirus software, as far as I know, currently exists for three reasons: pre-OS X Macs, the constant 'just-in-case-it-happens-in-the-future' scenario, and to remove viruses from email that could unknowingly be passed on to Windows users (even if they wouldn't affect the Mac itself, they can still be sent from a Mac).