waynejkruse10
Fully Optimized
- Messages
- 3,782
having no sse2 might be a harder problem than you expect.
horndude said:actually windows has snappier behavior than OS X, windows open and close quicker
OS X needs even more RAM than windows to get the snappy feel that windows has, even then it isnt as fast
OS X doesnt behave nearly as I/O bound as windows gets sometimes though, have no clue why, only thing I can figure is it balances loads better........linux does this too and makes windows look silly under heavy loads.
waynejkruse10 said:OSX is defenantly a more powerful OS but there are some really nice things that it doesnt have. The start menu on Windows (and applications/k menu in Linux) which are all basically the same thing make finding programs very easy. I have grown accustomed to this format. I guess OSX works differently as you can use spotlight for so much but the start menu can be accessed so easily. I dont like having to click on the apps folder all the time. I also like how windows sets out a whole bunch of folders for stuff automatically.
PS. About the look of the OS's. Both Windows and OSX look nice in my opinion however i think some of the animation things are silly but meh.
Thats what the OS X Dock is for! I keep all my most used applications in the dock for easy access.
waynejkruse10 said:It simply cannot contain the amount of programs as i would want it to. I wouldnt want to put 60 or more items into a dock because it would be very small, and difficult to track down the right programs.