The Educational software is not controlled by Microsoft. Microsoft has their own software that they use for educational purposes and none of it is for what is used in school.
So to make any difference you have to get those developers to get the software coded for Linux or get them to drop the price. Microsoft has done its part. It has done what it can. The cost of the educational software is out of their control just like driver development for their OS, just like game development for their OS. They do not do that part.
As i have said trying to get people to switch to Edubuntu for educational software wont help them. How many places aside from where you work do you know of that use Ubuntu for business? Now how many use Windows?
Jayce we have had lots of chats about the differences between the OS's themselves and how different they can be. To teach kids in school how to use Linux will hamper them more than help.
Yeah it will be great. The District can save millions of dollars by going with Edubuntu. Money that can be spent else where. But once those kids graduate and they dont know Windows (The current versions) and the software that companies use (Office not OpenOffice) how are we to expect them to get a job and be contributors?
This problem goes way beyond saving a school district some money. It goes way beyond trying to find a alternative to educational software. Cause even if you did get them on Edubuntu, in the long run you are hurting them cause they are behind the curve against other canidates for a job cause they were trained on Windows while your students have to learn that and the job.
Who will get the position when you seriously think about it? Someone who not only has to learn to do the job but the OS in use as well or someone who just has to learn the job.
I am not trying to say that Microsoft is the end all solution. I am not trying to defend their business practices. I am not trying to say that Open Source is not a viable alternative. Honestly i am not.
What i am trying to say is that Windows is the main used OS for businesses. Be it Windows 2000, Windows XP, Windows Vista some may even get onto Windows 7 when it gets released. Using Office XP, Office 2003 or Office 2007. That is the main software used. It covers about 90% of the companies out there. Maybe more maybe less.
While i do think that Linux is great and very powerful, i still think that given the choices of someone who would jsut have to be trained on the software vs someone who needs to learn the OS and software there wouldnt be a comparison.
Yeah it stinks. Yeah things need to change. But trying to get kids off of Windows to try and save a district some money wont help them. It will hurt them in the long run. Cause they will have to catch up to others who already learned this stuff on Windows.
So to make any difference you have to get those developers to get the software coded for Linux or get them to drop the price. Microsoft has done its part. It has done what it can. The cost of the educational software is out of their control just like driver development for their OS, just like game development for their OS. They do not do that part.
As i have said trying to get people to switch to Edubuntu for educational software wont help them. How many places aside from where you work do you know of that use Ubuntu for business? Now how many use Windows?
Jayce we have had lots of chats about the differences between the OS's themselves and how different they can be. To teach kids in school how to use Linux will hamper them more than help.
Yeah it will be great. The District can save millions of dollars by going with Edubuntu. Money that can be spent else where. But once those kids graduate and they dont know Windows (The current versions) and the software that companies use (Office not OpenOffice) how are we to expect them to get a job and be contributors?
This problem goes way beyond saving a school district some money. It goes way beyond trying to find a alternative to educational software. Cause even if you did get them on Edubuntu, in the long run you are hurting them cause they are behind the curve against other canidates for a job cause they were trained on Windows while your students have to learn that and the job.
Who will get the position when you seriously think about it? Someone who not only has to learn to do the job but the OS in use as well or someone who just has to learn the job.
I am not trying to say that Microsoft is the end all solution. I am not trying to defend their business practices. I am not trying to say that Open Source is not a viable alternative. Honestly i am not.
What i am trying to say is that Windows is the main used OS for businesses. Be it Windows 2000, Windows XP, Windows Vista some may even get onto Windows 7 when it gets released. Using Office XP, Office 2003 or Office 2007. That is the main software used. It covers about 90% of the companies out there. Maybe more maybe less.
While i do think that Linux is great and very powerful, i still think that given the choices of someone who would jsut have to be trained on the software vs someone who needs to learn the OS and software there wouldnt be a comparison.
Yeah it stinks. Yeah things need to change. But trying to get kids off of Windows to try and save a district some money wont help them. It will hurt them in the long run. Cause they will have to catch up to others who already learned this stuff on Windows.