Run Crysis smoothly?

[ricanflow]

I havent played it yet myself but i might download a demo to see what its all about.

 

[maroon1]

ya i know, maybe XCrossfire of HD 3870's can max it out . I want the HD 3870 x2 n get another one later.

No, two HD3870 in crossfire can't max Crysis

ATI Radeon HD 3870 and 3850: 55nm RV670 - HotHardware

Crysis is still not optimized for Crossfire

 

[NosBoost300]

No, two HD3870 in crossfire can't max Crysis

ATI Radeon HD 3870 and 3850: 55nm RV670 - HotHardware

Crysis is still not optimized for Crossfire

notice he said xcrossfire.. or better crossfire x... 4 cards read better!

hrmm... that chart makes me want to go for SLi this christmas!!!! 37 fps on 1680x1050 looks delicious to me

funny how the 2900xt is better than the 3870!! LOL

 

[Nitestick]

Just for some reason, even if the game is running in the low 20's.... it still looks relatively smooth. My guess is cause the frames might be low, but they are very stable. But who knows. I think most people would agree with the smoothness at low fps statement though.

the motion blur effects help. Crysis' motion blur (part of "post-processing") looks good. i've hated previous motion blur attempts in games like GRAW and NFS. i played Crysis at 1600x1200 with a single 7900GS i think (cant be sure though as this was when i still had 7900GS SLI on my old board, but i think i disabled it at one point during my testing) it's all about what graphical settings you use. in my experience the "models" setting provides the least visual improvement for the amount it taxes performance.

 

[pinoy3000]

I run all my games at the maximum resolution my screen is capable of. So its 1680 x 1050 resolution. I will not settle for less! Hehe. And because my card will not run Crysis at this resolution and high settings and still maintain at least 30 fps, I am not buying the game

Woot, loving GH3 though.