Ddestruction
Baseband Member
- Messages
- 73
There is no thin line. It's a flippin HUGE line.
Without modders you would not have games like Counter Strike. Without hackers you wouldn't have cheating. HUGE DIFFERENCE.
Hackers do not edit game files so much, they create files external to the game which usually get injected into the executable file when the game is launched, there are various methods however. The large majority of Hackers do not even create anything, they go to some lame site, pay $5 and download these hacks.
Modders change things, they change things and make them publicly available (usually) or just for themselfs, such as new skins and weapon models. This is called Modifying files to enhance\change gameplay.
Hackers create external applications to alter memory adress's within the game, to change statistics and data that effects the ingame Player so they have an unfair advantage over everyone else. This can be as simple in some peoples eyes as have a larger FOV, making smoke totally seethrough, etc.
There is a large line between the two.
I tell you what, go tell a Modder he is a hacker. His reaction will indicate the huge difference between the two.
What you are saying is like saying a Terrorist is the same a US/British Soldier because they both Kill people. Just no.
Terrorists use fear to get what they want. (Evil)
US/British Soldiers protect there country. (Good)
Modders give to the community (good)
hackers only benefit themselves (bad)
Modder does both. He becomes a hacker(bad) . And for some reason we are ok with this?
In terms of only modders and hackers isn't that the line?
Im just trying figure this out man. Most hackers do do what you say, I agree, but when they do both there just labled hacker? I would not like to one day become a well known modder and have the respect of a community and one day I use one of my mods for my own benefit and be labled a hacker and lose all respect because people thought there is only one "huge" clear cut difference between the two.