gaara said:
Now I had a 6800GT sitting around playing games that my 9800Pro could handle fine, and now I don't believe that my system will be able to handle this stuff as well as I hoped because they are now making the engine more and more complex
Hey, advancements in gaming tech and hardware are just a fact of life. What're they supposed to do? Not work to make better stuff?
gaara said:
So yeah, I basically blew close to two grand on something I can't even use...when they say a few weeks, I expect a few weeks,
So before a game even came out and had a chance to be fully tested (or even before the release cut was tested by reviewing parties) you threw 2-grand out with the hopes that things would work? Pshh. Maybe you should spend your money more carefully.
And really, everyone was talking about how beefy things were going to be in the HL2/D3 world when they came out. Everyone who bought a new high-end graphics card (like a 6800GT) did just fine. And continues to do just fine.
gaara said:
I don't know how the hell you don't have a problem with that but maybe you are just made of money like some of the little "I MUST UPGRADE MY FX-55 to FX-57" kids that run around here oh so often
...Because those people...are idiots. In the first place, it's just stupid to pay $700-900 for a chip that isn't even fully supported yet (or better still, to pay that kind of money for a chip that'll just drop in price anyway). Second, nowhere, in any press release or review, did it say you had to buy the world's fastest chip. You jumped the gun and threw tons of money towards something, and you want everyone else to pay for your mistake? Why?
If the game had come out when they said, the stuff you had bought would have worked. Though the game came out much later, the SAME stuff you bought, should still be working. What're you complaining that you bought the stuff back then and aren't going to get to buy it now instead? So the 6800GT plays the game, and you've already got it. What are you complaining about?
And to be honest, if you threw 2-grand at a machine to make it the best box out there, then it should still be. I paid $1,100 for the rig in my sig months before HL2 came out, and it does perfectly fine. You spent too much money, and it's no fault of Valve's. You show me a press release from Valve where they say you "MUST have a $800 FX-57 chip," and I'll forgive you.
gaara said:
It's my right as a consumer of the game to complain...if you don't like something, you don't just sit back and say "OHHH VALVE ALL YOUR STUFF IS 110% GOLD"...that isn't how progress works
Right, yeah...and my whole argument is that you guys are complaining about something that was just the way it was. I guarantee you the Valve dev staff didn't just go on vacation for 3 months to delay the game. But regardless, the game's out, it's doing well, your machine works, oh well. Maybe next time you'll wait for news from people who've actually touched the source of the problem, first.
And no, I don't think Valve is perfect. They've got their problems like everyone else does.
BTW, there's a company in Ohio that says they'll have a flying car on the market by 2010. I'm gonna go build a landing pad and construct a fuel tower by my house, and wait for it to happen as said.