lol. 1920x1200, 2xaa, max enthusiast DX10 crysis. 30-45fps, no higher no lower. no hiccups. runs beautifully, looks fantastic.
Same settings, or the farcry 2 equivilant, 45-85-ish fps, plays just as smooth as crysis, doesn't look as good. (though still looks great, so whatever.)
I don't care what anyone says. 30fps in these newer FPS games feels different than 30fps in the older games. What you said about the drop in fps being most noticable is true for sure, but jumping between 30-45 in crysis makes no difference.
And I lol when people say Source engine > cryengine.
Yes it is built and more than likely optimized better. It doesn't look even half as good. even with the full cinematic mods to improve the losuy textures in halflife 2, it has nothing on these two games in question. All it has is the fact that it's old enough that people can run it over 100fps. yeah it still looks good, but not even in the same league.
The unreal engine is good, but as far as graphics go its pretty much just the bloom slider cranked as high as it will go. :/ I love UT3 and play it a ton, and it does look good, and runs great, but same as the source engine, its just in the wrong league.
Anyhow, that widescreen thing is a bit irksome. I didn't know about it before, and honestly couldn't place what felt wrong, but there was something kind of nagging slightly that just looked.. off.
Obviously since I couldn't even put my finger on it till I seen that post, it's not a big enough deal to even worry about, but meh.
yeah far cry 2 has a bunch of bugs, and probably shouldn't have been released without further testing, but i'm not sorry I bought it
it's still loads of fun.
I do agree on the militia camps respawning every 3 min is crazy. Lol, I cleared 1, drive like 100 feet and talked to on of your buddies about a mission, took MAYBE 5 min including the driving, on the drive back the camp was full again.
GRRRRR. Lol.