stainer711
In Runtime
- Messages
- 429
For some reason my Far Cry 2 benches don't seem accurate. Guru3d's benchmark with very high settings on DX10 with a stock gtx 260 gave a result of 57 average fps on a core 2 duo 3.0ghz processor. I used the same very high settings on the benchmark program in DX9 with a E7200 core 2 duo overclocked to 3.4ghz and an overclocked gtx 260 running at 650/1160 and got an average of 46 fps. I'm not really seeing the logic in this. Does anyone else's benchmarks differ from that of Guru3d, or any other performance reviewing site, for that matter? Here are guru3d's settings and results. I am assuming they ran a short ranch. Any cooperation would be absolutely phenomenal.
anti-aliasing: 4x
Fire: very high
Physics: medium
Real trees: very high
vegetation: very high
shading: very high
terrain: very high
geometry: very high
post fx: high
texture: very high
shadow: very high
Ambient: high
Hdr and Bloom enabled
DX10
Far Cry 2 PC VGA Graphics performance review
anti-aliasing: 4x
Fire: very high
Physics: medium
Real trees: very high
vegetation: very high
shading: very high
terrain: very high
geometry: very high
post fx: high
texture: very high
shadow: very high
Ambient: high
Hdr and Bloom enabled
DX10
Far Cry 2 PC VGA Graphics performance review