Whirlwind
Fully Optimized
- Messages
- 2,400
I agree with the article for just gaming performance, for the games out there today.
Now benchmarking would be a different story, but gaming and bench marking are two different beast.
For gaming , most of the time it is about the GPU....not ALWAYS...but most of the time.
Even with my E6600 at 2.4 Ghz, the difference between my buddies rig with an E8400 at 3.0 Ghz is not at all noticable when playing games....Games like UT3.....Stalker...Fallout 3....matter of fact with he had a 9800 GTX instead of his GTX 260......his performance was not as good. This was all compared at 1680x1050 resolution.
So yes, I believe that article, if you are just talking about gaming only.
Now benchmarking would be a different story, but gaming and bench marking are two different beast.
For gaming , most of the time it is about the GPU....not ALWAYS...but most of the time.
Even with my E6600 at 2.4 Ghz, the difference between my buddies rig with an E8400 at 3.0 Ghz is not at all noticable when playing games....Games like UT3.....Stalker...Fallout 3....matter of fact with he had a 9800 GTX instead of his GTX 260......his performance was not as good. This was all compared at 1680x1050 resolution.
So yes, I believe that article, if you are just talking about gaming only.