Amazon AutoRip: How the labels held back progress for 14 years - Techist - Tech Forum

Go Back   Techist - Tech Forum > Techist Forum Information > News > The Net
Click Here to Login
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-11-2013, 08:22 PM   #1 (permalink)
Destroyer of headlines
Megatron's Avatar
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Headlines
Posts: 629
Default Amazon AutoRip: How the labels held back progress for 14 years

When Michael Robertson heard news of AutoRip, the new Amazon service that automatically adds high-quality MP3s to Cloud Player when you buy a CD, he must have had a sense of deja vu. After all, the entrepreneur introduced a similar service way back in 1999. Unfortunately, it wasn't licensed by the recording industry, and they sued it out of existence. He tried again with a licensed service in 2007, but only one label would cut a deal and the company failed to gain traction.

In a Friday interview with Ars Technica, Robertson told us that the major labels' decision to license AutoRip represents a sea change in their attitudes toward cloud music services. Until the last couple of years, the labels were relentlessly hostile to the idea that consumers should have the freedom to store DRM-free music online. But a series of business failures and legal defeats forced the labels to face reality. And so fourteen years after Robertson first floated the concept, consumers finally have the freedom to instantly get an MP3 when they buy a CD online.

Robertson's first company, was one of the hottest startups in Silicon Valley when it launched what we would now call a cloud music service,, in 1999. The service included a feature called "Beam-It" that allowed users to instantly stock their online lockers with music from their personal CD collections.

And also signed deals with several online CD vendors. If a user bought a CD from one of those vendors, MP3s of the songs on the CD would immediately become available for streaming from the user's music locker.

Licensed services like iTunes were still years in the future, largely because labels were skittish about selling music online. But Robertson believed he didn't need a license because the service was permitted by copyright's fair use doctrine. If a user can rip his legally purchased CD to his computer, why can't he also store a copy of it online? Robertson didn't see himself as facilitating copyright infringement. He just wanted to give users a more convenient way to get music they had already paid for.

But the courts disagreed, ruling that needed licenses from copyright holders to operate the service. And the labels simply weren't interested in Robertson's vision of convenient and flexible music lockers. So was driven into bankruptcy, and the "buy a CD, get an MP3" concept fell by the wayside.

More at Source
Megatron is offline   Reply With Quote

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off

Copyright 2002- Social Knowledge, LLC All Rights Reserved.

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:51 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2018, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.