Tuniq or True, which ones better? - Page 4 - Techist - Tech Forum

Go Back   Techist - Tech Forum > Computer Hardware > Overclocking and Modding
Click Here to Login
Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
 
Old 12-23-2007, 06:07 PM   #31 (permalink)
krazy Techie
 
krazyq's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 8,059
Default Re: Tuniq or True, which ones better?

Quote:
Originally Posted by veedubfreak View Post
Lets jsut say that my TRUE can keep my q6600 at 1.5V and 4ghz under 70C load.
I have a tuniq and ill be getting my q6600 this week and want to oc it to 3.4-3.6.
I can have upto 3 exhaust and 3/4 intakes...
Im hoping not to get over 60 on load.
__________________

__________________
Intel Core i5-4670K
ASRock Z97 Anniversary
8 GB G.SKILL Ripjaws
MSI GTX 1070 Gaming X
Sandisk Ultra II 960GB + Samsung 850 EVO 500GB + 2TB + 1TB WD Black
Samsung Note 8
2TB White PS4 Pro, PS3, Switch & New 3DS XL
65" LG OLED C7P
BenQ 27" XL2720Z
krazyq is offline  
Old 12-23-2007, 07:15 PM   #32 (permalink)
Monster Techie
 
mgcook's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 1,723
Send a message via AIM to mgcook
Default Re: Tuniq or True, which ones better?

Quote:
Originally Posted by krazyq View Post
I have a tuniq and ill be getting my q6600 this week and want to oc it to 3.4-3.6.
I can have upto 3 exhaust and 3/4 intakes...
Im hoping not to get over 60 on load.
probably wont happen....i get close to 70*C at 3.6

my temps don't go past 55*C though on 3.2
__________________

mgcook is offline  
Old 12-23-2007, 07:16 PM   #33 (permalink)
krazy Techie
 
krazyq's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 8,059
Default Re: Tuniq or True, which ones better?

Quote:
Originally Posted by mgcook View Post
probably wont happen....i get close to 70*C at 3.6

my temps don't go past 55*C though on 3.2
does it get to 70 on stress test load? or gaming and doing other stuff.
__________________
Intel Core i5-4670K
ASRock Z97 Anniversary
8 GB G.SKILL Ripjaws
MSI GTX 1070 Gaming X
Sandisk Ultra II 960GB + Samsung 850 EVO 500GB + 2TB + 1TB WD Black
Samsung Note 8
2TB White PS4 Pro, PS3, Switch & New 3DS XL
65" LG OLED C7P
BenQ 27" XL2720Z
krazyq is offline  
Old 12-23-2007, 07:22 PM   #34 (permalink)
Monster Techie
 
mgcook's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 1,723
Send a message via AIM to mgcook
Default Re: Tuniq or True, which ones better?

during Prime
mgcook is offline  
Old 12-23-2007, 07:24 PM   #35 (permalink)
krazy Techie
 
krazyq's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 8,059
Default Re: Tuniq or True, which ones better?

Quote:
Originally Posted by mgcook View Post
during Prime
o ok.
whats the max a quad should get to and not exceed?
and if its prime load i guess its not bad since a pc is never using all 4 cores and ram at max.
__________________
Intel Core i5-4670K
ASRock Z97 Anniversary
8 GB G.SKILL Ripjaws
MSI GTX 1070 Gaming X
Sandisk Ultra II 960GB + Samsung 850 EVO 500GB + 2TB + 1TB WD Black
Samsung Note 8
2TB White PS4 Pro, PS3, Switch & New 3DS XL
65" LG OLED C7P
BenQ 27" XL2720Z
krazyq is offline  
Old 12-23-2007, 07:28 PM   #36 (permalink)
Lord Techie
 
gurusan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 6,562
Send a message via MSN to gurusan
Default Re: Tuniq or True, which ones better?

70ish....but don't worry if it goes much higher, it will throttle before any damage occurs
__________________
|| 2500K @ 5GHz 1 thread, 4.8 2 threads, 4.6 3, 4.5 4 1.284V ||
|| P8P67-M Pro || 8GB @ 2133MHz ||
|| 5850 @ 1000/1225 || XFX 650W || Silverstone FT03B ||
|| 37" LCD TV || CM Hyper 212+ || Samsung 2.1 Soundbar ||
gurusan is offline  
Old 12-23-2007, 07:31 PM   #37 (permalink)
krazy Techie
 
krazyq's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 8,059
Default Re: Tuniq or True, which ones better?

Quote:
Originally Posted by gurusan View Post
70ish....but don't worry if it goes much higher, it will throttle before any damage occurs
yeah thats what i figured too.
well time to start putting the stock cooler back on for the ultra...

thanks mg&gur.
__________________
Intel Core i5-4670K
ASRock Z97 Anniversary
8 GB G.SKILL Ripjaws
MSI GTX 1070 Gaming X
Sandisk Ultra II 960GB + Samsung 850 EVO 500GB + 2TB + 1TB WD Black
Samsung Note 8
2TB White PS4 Pro, PS3, Switch & New 3DS XL
65" LG OLED C7P
BenQ 27" XL2720Z
krazyq is offline  
Old 12-23-2007, 11:28 PM   #38 (permalink)
Super Techie
 
mnelson07's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Denton, TX
Posts: 349
Default Re: Tuniq or True, which ones better?

Mine Q6600 @ 3.6GHz didn't go above 64 degrees on load with Orthos. Of course I have the Antec 900. When I had it at 3.4GHz It didn't go above 55. I'm debating on whether or not the 200MHz is worth the 10 added degrees or not.
__________________
Case: LIAN LI PC-A70B
Mobo: Gigabyte P35-DS3R
CPU: Intel Q6600 g0 @ 3.0GHz
HSF: Thermalright Ultra-120 Extreme
RAM: 4GB G.SKILL @ 4-4-4-12
VCard: EVGA 8800GTS G92 @ 700/1000
HDDs: 2x 750GB & 250GB
Optical: Sony NEC SATA DVD Burner
PSU: Silverstone 750W Modular
mnelson07 is offline  
Old 12-23-2007, 11:41 PM   #39 (permalink)
krazy Techie
 
krazyq's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 8,059
Default Re: Tuniq or True, which ones better?

Quote:
Originally Posted by mnelson07 View Post
Mine Q6600 @ 3.6GHz didn't go above 64 degrees on load with Orthos. Of course I have the Antec 900. When I had it at 3.4GHz It didn't go above 55. I'm debating on whether or not the 200MHz is worth the 10 added degrees or not.
did you run to instances of orthos?
orthos only utilized two cores so you need to open it twice.
__________________
Intel Core i5-4670K
ASRock Z97 Anniversary
8 GB G.SKILL Ripjaws
MSI GTX 1070 Gaming X
Sandisk Ultra II 960GB + Samsung 850 EVO 500GB + 2TB + 1TB WD Black
Samsung Note 8
2TB White PS4 Pro, PS3, Switch & New 3DS XL
65" LG OLED C7P
BenQ 27" XL2720Z
krazyq is offline  
Old 12-23-2007, 11:43 PM   #40 (permalink)
Monster Techie
 
mgcook's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 1,723
Send a message via AIM to mgcook
Default Re: Tuniq or True, which ones better?

Quote:
Originally Posted by mnelson07 View Post
Mine Q6600 @ 3.6GHz didn't go above 64 degrees on load with Orthos. Of course I have the Antec 900. When I had it at 3.4GHz It didn't go above 55. I'm debating on whether or not the 200MHz is worth the 10 added degrees or not.
thats because you have a good cooler and a case that flows good air

i have a antec 900...but i have a tuniq
__________________

mgcook is offline  
Closed Thread

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Zalman or Tuniq? Disillusion Overclocking and Modding 21 12-25-2007 12:19 AM
Tuniq thermal paste questions... Raknor Overclocking and Modding 2 10-28-2007 09:34 PM
TT Armor and Tuniq QuaziBee New Systems | Building and Buying 6 09-04-2007 05:10 PM
Attention all Tuniq tower 120 owners! Gabb New Systems | Building and Buying 30 08-25-2007 03:10 PM
Further confusion, Tuniq tower related Gabb New Systems | Building and Buying 14 07-21-2007 06:33 PM



Copyright 2002- Social Knowledge, LLC All Rights Reserved.

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:12 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.