The Tech Forums Official Crysis [Warhead] GPU Benchmark Thread - Page 33 - Techist - Tech Forum

Go Back   Techist - Tech Forum > Computer Hardware > Overclocking and Modding
Click Here to Login
Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
 
Old 10-13-2008, 12:36 PM   #321 (permalink)
The Bulldog
 
zmatt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: In an empty Ramen packet
Posts: 4,660
Default Re: The Tech Forums Official Crysis [Warhead] GPU Benchmark Thread

But you Q6600 has more than a 33% performance increase over his Pentium D.
__________________

__________________


ポップ・タルトが大好きです。
<<<<<<<Rep is always welcome
Ultimate Guitar exercises/ Songs for technique
zmatt is offline  
Old 10-13-2008, 03:37 PM   #322 (permalink)
Wizard Techie
 
philbar71's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Suffolk, VA
Posts: 4,533
Send a message via AIM to philbar71
Default Re: The Tech Forums Official Crysis [Warhead] GPU Benchmark Thread

^ way more than 33%. i was running it at 16x aa and there was a 1fps loss i'll get screens in a minuet. so crysis isint as cpu intensive as i thought. all though the core clock of gfx was 860mhz so that might be a factor.
__________________

__________________


The only thing ATi can render faster than nVidia is the BSOD

SLI ON INTEL P45: http://www.techist.com/pc/f76/sli-intel-chipset-219886/

<<< i like rep :D
philbar71 is offline  
Old 10-13-2008, 09:51 PM   #323 (permalink)
Camera junky
 
Poizen22's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: ottawa ontario canada.
Posts: 6,280
Default Re: The Tech Forums Official Crysis [Warhead] GPU Benchmark Thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by philbar71 View Post
^ way more than 33%. i was running it at 16x aa and there was a 1fps loss i'll get screens in a minuet. so crysis isint as cpu intensive as i thought. all though the core clock of gfx was 860mhz so that might be a factor.
the fact that you had a 1 fps drop means it is cpu intensive as your cpu is botle neckign gyou, where as with 16xaa the gfx card cant stretch its legs, and with out it the 9800gtx is beign slowed down by the cpu. and not matter how high the setting you end up with the same fps. also its gonna be more then a 33% increase as his card is faster the diference is 33% in our scores but he has a faster gpu where as i have a faster cpu. ive seen 9800gtx get in the 48/50 range for warhead, guru posted scores way back. anyway thats is over 50% speed increase for just a cpu upgrade alone, so yes crysis is some what cpu intensive.
__________________

https://www.flickr.com/photos/poizen22/
intel Core I7 8700k@ 5.0ghz-Nvidia GTX1080 ti ftw3-Aorus 5 z370 mobo-16gb ddr4 G-Skill trident Z rgb 3000mhz - 1tb samsung 960 pro, 2tb wd blue- thermaltake rgb 750w gold-Phanteks pro M TG- Samsung CHG70 1440p 144hz 32 inch QLED.
Poizen22 is offline  
Old 10-14-2008, 12:51 AM   #324 (permalink)
Ultra Techie
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 805
Default Re: The Tech Forums Official Crysis [Warhead] GPU Benchmark Thread

guys this is the warhead benchmark you guys were using the old one for normal crysis
Crysis WARHEAD Benchmark Tool BETA download from Guru3D.com
backup287 is offline  
Old 10-15-2008, 06:08 AM   #325 (permalink)
Hard Gay Nahalem! Fooo!
 
NosBoost300's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Bellflower, CA
Posts: 10,154
Send a message via AIM to NosBoost300
Default Re: The Tech Forums Official Crysis [Warhead] GPU Benchmark Thread

not all of us have warhead



my new score with the gtx 260 oc to 704mhz
e7200 @ 3.02
__________________
Current Build:
Intel 3770k @ 4.4 GHZ | Galaxy GTX 770 SLi | 16 GB G.Skill Sniper | ASrock z77 Extreme4
2xSamung 840pro 128GB in Raid | 2x1TB Seagate | Antec 750 Watt GamerSeries
Media Build:
Intel Core i3 3220 | Galaxy GTX 650 | 8 GB Corsair Vengeance | ASrock B75M | Samsung 840 120GB
NosBoost300 is offline  
Old 10-15-2008, 07:03 AM   #326 (permalink)
Camera junky
 
Poizen22's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: ottawa ontario canada.
Posts: 6,280
Default Re: The Tech Forums Official Crysis [Warhead] GPU Benchmark Thread

zomg thats better then the 9800gx2, i think i want a 260 but a slr for school is priority right now
__________________

https://www.flickr.com/photos/poizen22/
intel Core I7 8700k@ 5.0ghz-Nvidia GTX1080 ti ftw3-Aorus 5 z370 mobo-16gb ddr4 G-Skill trident Z rgb 3000mhz - 1tb samsung 960 pro, 2tb wd blue- thermaltake rgb 750w gold-Phanteks pro M TG- Samsung CHG70 1440p 144hz 32 inch QLED.
Poizen22 is offline  
Old 10-15-2008, 07:39 PM   #327 (permalink)
Newb Techie
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 29
Default Re: The Tech Forums Official Crysis [Warhead] GPU Benchmark Thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by Poizen22 View Post
zomg thats better then the 9800gx2, i think i want a 260 but a slr for school is priority right now
russtheman is offline  
Old 10-15-2008, 08:17 PM   #328 (permalink)
Hard Gay Nahalem! Fooo!
 
NosBoost300's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Bellflower, CA
Posts: 10,154
Send a message via AIM to NosBoost300
Default Re: The Tech Forums Official Crysis [Warhead] GPU Benchmark Thread

very nice russ, but what cpu do you have.. i'm on an e7200.. not taht it would make a 10fps difference!! LOL...

ya i didnt think the 9800gx2 did worse than my gtx260.. i owned one and knew first hand the gx2 was better
__________________
Current Build:
Intel 3770k @ 4.4 GHZ | Galaxy GTX 770 SLi | 16 GB G.Skill Sniper | ASrock z77 Extreme4
2xSamung 840pro 128GB in Raid | 2x1TB Seagate | Antec 750 Watt GamerSeries
Media Build:
Intel Core i3 3220 | Galaxy GTX 650 | 8 GB Corsair Vengeance | ASrock B75M | Samsung 840 120GB
NosBoost300 is offline  
Old 10-15-2008, 08:22 PM   #329 (permalink)
Ultra Techie
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Long Island, NY, USA
Posts: 881
Send a message via AIM to Ethan_Kaizer Send a message via MSN to Ethan_Kaizer
Default Re: The Tech Forums Official Crysis [Warhead] GPU Benchmark Thread

I'll hopefully get Warhead in a couple days. I get about 28 fps on the original Crysis, on all High settings, no AA, on 1280 x 1024, with my HD 4670, which is very playable, and I can't be upset with that for paying 80 bucks.
__________________
||Core 2 Duo E4600 @ 2.4 GHz (OC coming soon) || Biostar TP45HP || 4GB Kingston DDR2 667 RAM ||
Sapphire HD 4670 512mb @778/1140 || Antec Trio 650w || Maxtor 250gb 7200 RPM HDD || Lite-On DVD-RW || Black Aluminum Case||
Ethan_Kaizer is offline  
Old 10-15-2008, 10:36 PM   #330 (permalink)
Lord Techie
 
ricanflow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Euless, Tx
Posts: 6,317
Default Re: The Tech Forums Official Crysis [Warhead] GPU Benchmark Thread

We need you to do warhead nos, crysis is old already.

New hardware = new games
__________________

__________________
3DMARK06 = 20,341 (3.8GHZ)



Laptop
P7350 | GTX 260M | 4GB DDR2 800 | 320GB HD | X-Fi | Vista 64

Folding Rig/File Server

M775 | E1200 | Foxconn P9657AB
| Dual 8800GT | Antec NeoHE 500 | Barracuda 80GB | Wintec Ampx



ricanflow is offline  
Closed Thread

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off




Copyright 2002- Social Knowledge, LLC All Rights Reserved.

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:43 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.