***Super Pi Rankings ** - Page 20 - Techist - Tech Forum

Go Back   Techist - Tech Forum > Computer Hardware > Overclocking and Modding
Click Here to Login
Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
 
Old 09-26-2005, 04:50 PM   #191 (permalink)
Banned
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 2,327
Send a message via AIM to Flanker
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by _OvErClOcKeD_
Having the ram run the same as the cpu bus or faster is usually better for gaming. but its hard to say, i would think 2.3Ghz 1:1 is better since 2.6 is much faster of a cpu speed when your lacking ram speed.
God, this is just getting so old.

No Pzero, running 1:1 won't help you in ANYTHING. The point of the whole overclocking this is to get both your mem and CPU as high as possible. If your memory maxes out at 230Mhz, then if you run 1:1, you'll be limited to 2.3Ghz. If you put on a divider, and you can get your CPU to run at 2.6Ghz while you memory runs at (ideally) 230 Mhz, then that is MUCH better. Even if your memory will run at 210 Mhz or so, you should be able to tighten timings and it would still be better than both running at 230Mhz.
__________________

Flanker is offline  
Old 09-26-2005, 04:52 PM   #192 (permalink)
Banned
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 2,327
Send a message via AIM to Flanker
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by _OvErClOcKeD_
Even still, who the hells cuts off over a minute on their Super Pi 1M from overclocking? something in your system is not runnin right, you should not gain that much just from overclocking. I can see cutting off a minute or two on the 32M but a 1M run should NOT be cut in half from overclocking, and its not even some extreme overclock so that makes no sense..
What the hell are you talking about? I didn't cut my SuperPi 1m time in half. It was reduced 7s due to overcocking 25%.
__________________

Flanker is offline  
Old 09-26-2005, 04:53 PM   #193 (permalink)
Banned
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 2,327
Send a message via AIM to Flanker
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by _OvErClOcKeD_
So then have everyone get the ORIGINAL version of super pi, put in the patch and run it, then it supports all processors, i don't see why i should have to slow down my score because you guys don't think its fair that i want to use my processors full potential. Many AMD's would benefit from that patch also because it uses their SSE3 instructions also, thats why i don't see why its called a prescott patch when it works for AMD's also.
You're not making your CPU go slower. You're just getting a slower score; A score that everyone else has, so its easier to compare.
Flanker is offline  
Old 09-26-2005, 04:56 PM   #194 (permalink)
True Techie
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 131
Default

Are you guys blind or what? how is it fair that people cannot use the full instructions their CPU has because others do not have it?

And sorry i miss read one of your posts i though you said 1 minute and 41 seconds sorry, i just quickly read it over.
__________________
P4 2.8E @ 3.5Ghz(24/7),3.72Ghz (benchmarking) 1:1
Abit IC7 Max 3
2 X 512mb OCZ PC 3700 dual channel Performance series ram
EVGA 6800GT @ 440mhz/1.2Ghz(24/7), 451/1.23Ghz (max benchable)
2X80 gig SATA RAID 0 drives
SB Audigy 2 24bit
Black X-Blade Gaming Case
Enermax 460 watt PSU
CPU Cooled By: Thermalright Xp 90 + 92 mm panaflo fan
GPU Cooled By: Arctic Cooling Nv Silencer 5 Rev. 2
_OvErClOcKeD_ is offline  
Old 09-26-2005, 05:22 PM   #195 (permalink)
Monster Techie
 
idiotec's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,748
Default

Quote:
Are you guys blind or what? how is it fair that people cannot use the full instructions their CPU has because others do not have it?
Dude, most all of HAVE the instruction, it has NOTHING to do with that. THEY DON'T HAVE AN ANTI-CHEAT VERSION OF IT!

If you are so insecure that you cannot give up a couple seconds of your score, then don't participate. I could care less. But posting a score using a version that you know is not comparable to others is just crap. Go ***** somewhere else about
__________________

BE HEARD - Techonvent
DS3 | E6400 - 3.2GHz 24/7 | 2GB OCZ PLat. PC6400 | 6800GT | Zippy 460W
What the world needs is more geniuses with humility, there are so few of us left.
idiotec is offline  
Old 09-26-2005, 05:25 PM   #196 (permalink)
True Techie
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 131
Default

your not the one runnin this thread so why dont you piss off?
__________________
P4 2.8E @ 3.5Ghz(24/7),3.72Ghz (benchmarking) 1:1
Abit IC7 Max 3
2 X 512mb OCZ PC 3700 dual channel Performance series ram
EVGA 6800GT @ 440mhz/1.2Ghz(24/7), 451/1.23Ghz (max benchable)
2X80 gig SATA RAID 0 drives
SB Audigy 2 24bit
Black X-Blade Gaming Case
Enermax 460 watt PSU
CPU Cooled By: Thermalright Xp 90 + 92 mm panaflo fan
GPU Cooled By: Arctic Cooling Nv Silencer 5 Rev. 2
_OvErClOcKeD_ is offline  
Old 09-26-2005, 05:32 PM   #197 (permalink)
Lord Techie
 
PZEROFGH's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 7,553
Send a message via AIM to PZEROFGH
Default

Uh oh, i feel a closing thread.

anyways heres my up to date score. somewhere around 34.87 or something why dont you just look for yourself.

5 minutes go by

geez this thing is so big



^^Better?>
__________________
Hmmm?
AIM/Xfire - pzerofgh
PZEROFGH is offline  
Old 09-26-2005, 05:37 PM   #198 (permalink)
True Techie
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 131
Default

nah i let it go, but without the pattch to utilize my SSE3 instructions i lose 4 seconds which is crap but wutever
__________________
P4 2.8E @ 3.5Ghz(24/7),3.72Ghz (benchmarking) 1:1
Abit IC7 Max 3
2 X 512mb OCZ PC 3700 dual channel Performance series ram
EVGA 6800GT @ 440mhz/1.2Ghz(24/7), 451/1.23Ghz (max benchable)
2X80 gig SATA RAID 0 drives
SB Audigy 2 24bit
Black X-Blade Gaming Case
Enermax 460 watt PSU
CPU Cooled By: Thermalright Xp 90 + 92 mm panaflo fan
GPU Cooled By: Arctic Cooling Nv Silencer 5 Rev. 2
_OvErClOcKeD_ is offline  
Old 09-26-2005, 05:53 PM   #199 (permalink)
Monster Techie
 
idiotec's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,748
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by _OvErClOcKeD_
nah i let it go, but without the pattch to utilize my SSE3 instructions i lose 4 seconds which is crap but wutever
I know, it sucks, if you look back on page 10 I posted one with the patch as well (just messing around), 29s, and that was with all normal processes running.

Trust me, I would like to see them mod the SSE3 version as well, but until then we're screwed.
__________________

BE HEARD - Techonvent
DS3 | E6400 - 3.2GHz 24/7 | 2GB OCZ PLat. PC6400 | 6800GT | Zippy 460W
What the world needs is more geniuses with humility, there are so few of us left.
idiotec is offline  
Old 09-26-2005, 05:54 PM   #200 (permalink)
True Techie
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 131
Default

well i can pull off 35 seconds @ 3.7Ghz
__________________

__________________
P4 2.8E @ 3.5Ghz(24/7),3.72Ghz (benchmarking) 1:1
Abit IC7 Max 3
2 X 512mb OCZ PC 3700 dual channel Performance series ram
EVGA 6800GT @ 440mhz/1.2Ghz(24/7), 451/1.23Ghz (max benchable)
2X80 gig SATA RAID 0 drives
SB Audigy 2 24bit
Black X-Blade Gaming Case
Enermax 460 watt PSU
CPU Cooled By: Thermalright Xp 90 + 92 mm panaflo fan
GPU Cooled By: Arctic Cooling Nv Silencer 5 Rev. 2
_OvErClOcKeD_ is offline  
Closed Thread

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off




Copyright 2002- Social Knowledge, LLC All Rights Reserved.

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:19 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.