*The Official Tech-Forums 3DMark06/03 Rankings*

Re: The Tech Forums Official 3DMark06/03 Top List

22000 wow nice job, but room for loads of improvement. you should be getting in to the 30k range with some extreme overclocking.
 
Re: The Tech Forums Official 3DMark06/03 Top List

yes i would expect nothing less from intel. they have never disapointed me (excecpt for the pentium d's)
 
Re: The Tech Forums Official 3DMark06/03 Top List

i know.. it took me 4.3ghz to get 6700 cpu score out of a qx6850.. these results amaze me... i think thats all i might do for today.. i'm playing some fallout3 right now :p

[*COLOR=Blue][*B]22041[/b][/color] | Nosboost300 |Intel Core i7@ 3200mhz | GTX 260 SLi (core 192+216) | XP 32bit
 
Re: The Tech Forums Official 3DMark06/03 Top List

i know.. it took me 4.3ghz to get 6700 cpu score out of a qx6850.. these results amaze me... i think thats all i might do for today.. i'm playing some fallout3 right now :p

[*COLOR=Blue][*B]2088[/b][/color] | Nosboost300 |Intel Core i7@ 3200mhz | GTX 260 SLi (core 192+216) | XP 32bit

its what that kinda system is good for, and yo im mad about yoru cpu scorey ou slaughterd mine :(
 
Re: The Tech Forums Official 3DMark06/03 Top List

yeah, the core i7s pull out some mad cpu scores (especially in vantage)... they should execute an average of 30-40% more instructions clock for clock than Penryns because of the monolithic structure, increased interconnect rate and, of course, the massive memory bandwidth increase
 
Re: The Tech Forums Official 3DMark06/03 Top List

man im not even comparign this with penryns im comparing this with conroe/kentsfield. which is what i have kentsfiels is basicaly 2 conroe cores glued together.
 
Back
Top Bottom